Artemis haters, can we have a moment, please? spacenews.com/artemis-haters…

Ladies and gentlemen, we have completion. The instructions and parts lists for the Saturn V Mobile Launcher are officially finished! Next stop: Rebrickable.

I've done everything on my end - now it's up to Rebrickable. Looks like there won't be auto-approval this time.

While I'm waiting for Rebrickable, I went back to the enormous 12 m Ares V cargo fairing. I wanted to try a different approach to building the fairing. I'm not entirely convinced by the studs, and it's still very much a prototype. What are your thoughts?

Random things: - I'm still waiting for Rebrickable for the approval of the Saturn V Apollo ML instructions. It's unusually long now. - After 3 months it was about time to rebuild the Milkstool, right? - I hope that at weekend I'll have time to work on the shelf for the ML's.

I never thought it that this mess around SLS will be LEGO's fault...

It feels illegal. I was too lazy to create a new template and the hole was way too close to 24x32mm anyway.

Did anyone else noticed that BOLE DM-1 actually overperformed by 7.7%? (4.2M lbf instead of the expected 3.9M lbf.) No wonder why the Nozzle said, "See you guys, I'm out."

Speaking of Titan 3L-Shuttle, I have a few question: forms.cloud.microsoft/r/jETbPBM2Re (No, it's not a project announcement)

If the SLS were a Falcon 9, then Jared Isaacman's "fantastic" plan would look like this. I could agree with the LEO A3 mission (well, SpaceX aren't ready anyway), but the ‘Standard SLS’ is nothing more than sabotaging NASA’s own SHLV capability.

SLS has never been on a 3+ year cadence and core Stage 2 was delivered in 2024. Additional time waiting for Orion investigation had nothing to do with SLS. Plan has been once a year once operational since inception by the first trump administration. 2020 and 2023 budget req