🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

I used to shoot $500k pharmaceutical commercials. I made this for $500 in Veo 3 credits in less than a day. What’s the argument for spending $500K now? (Steal my prompt below 👇🏼)

The X discussion about the Claude 4 system card is getting counterproductive It punishes Anthropic for actually releasing full safety tests and admitting to unusual behaviors. And I bet the behaviors of other models are really similar to Claude & now more labs will hide results.

A reason companies are excited about agents is that they think agents will let them skip the hard task of figuring how to integrate AI into the daily process of work- in theory, agents just let you treat the AI like an employee. More value will come from tackling the hard task.

How morally bankrupt do you have to be to advocate against supporting a country fighting for its survival? Boycott.

Humans and other animals minimize effort when possible, but effort paradoxically enhances the value of rewards and activities. Michael Inzlicht et al propose and explore three potential resolutions to this paradox: buff.ly/w21eT7S

I looked at the evidence that AI is replacing entry-level workers in white collar jobs. Bottom line: the scale/timing of job loss is uncertain, but this is not just hype. Companies are really doing it. nytimes.com/2025/05/30/tec…

perplexity quietly built a kind of cognitive operating system. it’s not really a google competitor anymore… framing it that way just shrinks your imagination & does it a huge disservice. i think of it as a swiss army knife for thought… retrieval, execution, synthesis, all

Physical fitness may not increase longevity after all. Not as much as we thought anyway. [Link below.]

iOS Camera disabled if near tourist attractions

An analysis of ~100,000 academics finds that a small subset of academics generate majority of tweets. That vocal minority can skew how the public—and even journalists—infer “academic consensus,” potentially fueling false perceptions.

Glad nationaldag Sverige! Tack för allt ni gör, från alla ukrainare. 🇺🇦🤝🇸🇪

I hate it when people just read the titles of papers and think they understand the results. The "Illusion of Thinking" paper does 𝘯𝘰𝘵 say LLMs don't reason. It says current “large reasoning models” (LRMs) 𝘥𝘰 reason—just not with 100% accuracy, and not on very hard

I have attached the original source where Yann Lecun speaks so contemptuously about Dario Amodei. Anyone can read and verify this for themselves. Yann Lecun's behavior is completely incomprehensible to me, especially for a scientist.

There is a strain of AI skepticism that is rooted in pretending like it’s still 2021 and nobody can actually use this stuff for themselves. It has survived for longer than I would have guessed!

This is likely going to be another NAION: Lots of panic over a weak study, followed by a debunking that never gets talked about.

One thing we discovered in our new paper is that this is now a very bad prompt Asking modern models to “answer directly” results in less accurate outcomes than not including that instruction. Models do best when they can “think,” and telling them to be direct can hurt reasoning.

POV: you are about to be replaced by AI

New Anthropic Research: A new set of evaluations for sabotage capabilities. As models gain more agentic abilities, we need to get smarter in how we monitor them. We’re publishing a new set of complex evaluations that test for sabotage—and sabotage-monitoring—capabilities.

Zero-sum thinking is a tragedy and a trap, but it is no mystery, writes @timharford. We can put the blame on our dysfunctional politics and our sluggish economies, which have needlessly produced far too many zero-sum situations: buff.ly/q3y2wL7