Rodrigo P₳cini 🇧🇷
@rodrigopacini
Building @Agora_Cardano
Proposal Reviewer and Moderator on #ProjectCatalyst since 2020
dRep ID - drep1yt9dq806jcm56wzhnv2yrf6gcyq7h4gap8gxewfykk0dtfs7vf843
ID: 40031847
14-05-2009 16:45:54
20,20K Tweet
859 Takipçi
421 Takip Edilen
Vvv good write up A must read. the data is here, it is clear Project Catalyst is not doing what it is meant to - undeniably now we need a sense of urgency from the team to fix things and from the community to diversify funding streams
Catalyst fund14 impressions Been in crypto since 2019. Participated in governance across chains. Early L2 adopter-won grants on Arbitrum & Optimism. Grant reviewer and approver for Hedera. Came to Cardano in May for Veridian’s digital identity framework by Cardano Foundation . Applied
Project Catalyst Juan TheOne Fayyaadh Kriss Baird Danny 🐣 🇯🇵 Input | Output 🧾 Fund 14 Final Results (Post–Cubic Adjustment) ❌ The failed experiment, things may break and indeed they are breaking for 5 years. After the Catalyst team decided to remove the cubic voting function from the final tally, Fund 14 reverted to a standard 1 ADA = 1 vote model
Kat If Project Catalyst (or other Cardano sources) funded similar / related projects previously, any new project seeking funding (i.e contract mediation, etc...) should research & reference all previous ones and fully explain what is different, why previous ones failed, why more funding
Hey Project Catalyst Team It would seem there is quite a lot of discussion atm about whether Catalyst funding is being effective in launching new initiatives on #Cardano given the amount of funds going to established projects. I appreciate that you are experimenting with voting