Regan Bernhard
@rbernhard13
Lecturer in Psychology and Neuroscience at Boston College working on instrumental harm and the neural instantiation of hypothetical thought.
ID: 825021295544852481
27-01-2017 16:42:59
11 Tweet
232 Followers
270 Following
What drives our judgments of whether an agent was forced or acted freely? In a new paper with Jonathan Phillips we test novel predictions made by the theory that force judgments depend on the normality of counterfactual alternatives. See our preprint here: psyarxiv.com/gb3q7
How do we decide whether someone was forced or acted freely? In our forthcoming publication in Cognition Jonathan Phillips and I provide evidence that force judgments depend on the normality of counterfactual alternatives. authors.elsevier.com/a/1fOcG2Hx2piwu
Spontaneously thinking about how things could have gone but didn't is a key feature of many of the judgments we make. Excited to share our new preprint where @fierycushman, Jonathan Phillips, and I investigate how the brain engages in this type of thought: psyarxiv.com/zdf2w
Officially out today at PSPB w/ Experimental Philosophy Thinking a group has an biological “essence” relates to bias about group members. It is often thought that this is because essentialism CAUSES bias We reexamine this given some surprising results journals.sagepub.com/eprint/EW4SMGU…