Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile
Tomek Włodarek

@poddrzewem

Fat-free software. Better, faster and happier teams.

ID: 15511349

linkhttp://www.poddrzewem.pl calendar_today21-07-2008 06:14:15

2,2K Tweet

1,1K Followers

172 Following

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Large, silo teams naturally adopt a waterfall work model. Batches of work, the time needed to complete them, and time between handovers increase. Teams move further away from a common goal, though they continue to revolve around it. 4/9

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As the connection with the end result becomes thinner and longer, here and now becomes a more tangible goal than the final, collaborative result. The centrifugal force grows, pushing the teams even further apart. 5/9

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Although the organization still revolves around the common product, the centrifugal force scatters the teams along three dimensions: competence (specialization), size (magnitude) of the work batches, and time (process). 6/9

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Imagine these silo teams (or masses) spinning on thin ropes. Moving independently, yet spinning around a center that still holds them together. Collisions? Yes. Coordination issues? Sure. Delays? Of course. 7/9

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The traditional answer is to bring on the coordinators (jugglers). The bigger the problem the more of them. Second solution? The matrix structure. While both ideas seem valid, they merely (attempt to) counterbalance the powerful organizational centrifugal force (inertia). 8/9

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Any ideas on how to stop or better how to prevent the inertia? Or is it just the organizational law of physics and we're screwed? I pictured this in a conversation with Adam Michalczyk and Andrey Zinchuk (thanks guys!). I won't risk illustrating, maybe someone more talented will try. 9/9

Todd Charron (@toddcharron) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What happened to Agile Coaching? I’ve been in Agile for quite some time now What I see today doesn’t look anything like the Agile I got involved with I think it's time we talked about it

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

During today's very productive meeting with the stakeholders, I reduced my backlog in the delayed project from 360 to 913 items. The deadline remains unchanged.

Shit User Story (@shituserstory) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As a… – Twitter user I want… – unlimited interactivity – centered in audio, video, messaging, payments/banking – creating a global marketplace for ideas, goods, services, and opportunities. so that… – It’s no longer possible to even parody this fucking shitshow.

As a…
– Twitter user
I want…
– unlimited interactivity – centered in audio, video, messaging, payments/banking – creating a global marketplace for ideas, goods, services, and opportunities.
so that…
– It’s no longer possible to even parody this fucking shitshow.
Uncle Bob Martin (@unclebobmartin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You cannot fail a sprint. Sprints cannot fail. The purpose of a sprint is to produce management data. A sprint that delivers zero stories has produced very important and useful data for managers.

Tomek Włodarek (@poddrzewem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Spodobało się, więc podam dalej: Definition of Done to różnica pomiędzy „zrobione”, a „zrobione jak trzeba”. #scrum #DoD

Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 (@pmarca) 's Twitter Profile Photo

THE TECHNO-OPTIMIST MANIFESTO part 1 “You live in a deranged age — more deranged than usual, because despite great scientific and technological advances, man has not the faintest idea of who he is or what he is doing.” — Walker Percy “Our species is 300,000 years old. For the