"a vote for a third party is a vote for Trump" means that a vote for a third party is also a vote for Kamala so either way I'm good right?

Starting to wonder if a lot of the anti-third party folks simply think that the republicans and democrats have been the only two mainstream political parties for the entirety of US history?

The parties have changed, broken down, consolidated, and been replaced. The idea that a third party can't win, or won't eventually achieve mainstream appeal or power, is just historically untrue.

Updating my CV and trying to find out where to add my girl cause she's my highest achievement

if you need to commit genocide, or commit massacres, or brutalize protestors, to win elections... then I'd rather lose the election and explore alternative methods to achieve power.

notice when liberals say "build power and win" they just mean getting elected. no wins for concrete and lasting policies, no wins for permanent and lasting change, no wins for those suffering a genocide... just another few years for a politician to rake in some donor money

keep putting your faith in these politicians...you're just begging the butcher to save you from the cutting board

i can't wait to vote for Jill Stein 2,000 times in my home state and the state my school is in (both swing states)

Just two minutes of well thought out and explained facts, and all liberals can respond with is "but you can't win😠"

Bernie was the blueprint for what AOC has become. She's an attack dog for the democratic party, meant to corral those who are susceptible on the "Left" back into the party, and fight against those who refuse to abandon their principles.

just another day thinking about how they definitely assassinated Epstein and we all know they did but we just moved on

you all don't care this much about pets dying when it's police killing them huh?

it's the same white supremacist colonial justification we've heard for centuries, regardless of whose voice is used to spread it