Bloomberg published an interesting piece today on direct air capture (DAC) and it’s a reminder that the carbon removal space is in the middle of a shift. As the market grows, the rules, incentives, and expectations are evolving too. DAC operates under some of the strictest

I’m grateful we have Erin Burns and Carbon180 to decode what the proposed budget means for CDR

Transparency is key to accountability––thrilled to see Absolute Climate prioritize public comment as they're building their methodology. Everyone who is even a little interested in this should take a look.

Since this Climeworks story is now ripping through socials, it's a good time for a little thread on the piece Early responses have all been dunking on DAC, but this is bigger than one technology What does the piece get right, what does it get wrong🧵 heimildin.is/grein/24581/cl…

Great thread. Another reminder that too much of the most difficult technical work on decarbonization solutions often falls victim to the vibes discourse because it aligns uncomfortably with our ideals of what we think climate progress ought to look like.

I've always really admired Carbon180 and the great work they do. So I was thrilled to restart The Carbon Curve podcast with a conversation with Erin Burns about where things go from here on carbon removal policy in the US. carboncurve.substack.com/p/whats-in-sto…

Not all carbon removal credits are created equal. Before you buy, ask: Does this credit actually deliver a negative emission? Some remove CO₂ but fall short of net-negativity. If your claims rely on it, make sure your credits are fit for that use. What questions are you

The only unstoppable forces in this world are death, taxes and carbon middle management. Congrats Jack Andreasen Cavanaugh 🍾 I can’t imagine a better person for the job

Who writes the rules makes a difference. When the same group creates, enforces, and checks the rules, conflicts of interest can sneak in. For better-quality credits, look for ones where these roles are handled by separate parties. How are you assessing who’s behind the rules?