Laura Gibbs
@onlinecrslady
Retired after 20+ years of teaching online at Univ. of Oklahoma.
Now...I write!
LauraGibbs.net
#AgainstSurveillance #ControlledDigitalLending #Ungrading she/her
ID: 7044082
http://LauraGibbs.net 24-06-2007 04:17:20
129,129K Tweet
7,7K Followers
3,3K Following
if you need some background on how this (horrible) decision will affect the Internet Archive, controlled digital lending, and the future of online preservation, you can read the explainer Emma Wallenbrock and I wrote two years ago on this case: slate.com/technology/202…
This is absolutely devastating for poorer students and all who would like to educate themselves but lack the access to academic works. The campaign against Internet Archive serves nobody but the wallets of publishers at the expense of everyone else.
the decision (60 pages) re: @InternetArchive is abysmal: complete surrender of public good to profiteering! no doubt they would get rid of libraries and the used book market too if they could... all so that publishers can make more money. read it and weep: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Internet Archive Responds to Appellate Opinion in Hachette v. Internet Archive: blog.archive.org/2024/09/04/int… You can take action today by asking the publishers to restore access to the 500,000+ books removed from Internet Archive: change.org/LetReadersRead #LetReadersRead
"Over the past four years we have advocated for library choice in the digital market.... We will continue to do so, and to support Internet Archive's fight for the rights of libraries to 'own, lend, and preserve books.'" Our full statement: libraryfutures.net/post/were-stil…
I also hope the judgment will remain limited. the publishers failed to include any titles in the works-in-suit that did NOT have ebooks (this emerged in the arguments re: injunctive relief) - so maybe that will end up limiting scope of the judgment...? authorsalliance.substack.com/p/hachette-v-i… 1/2