NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile
NTech

@ntech_org

ID: 766278343113269248

linkhttps://meta.bearblog.dev/ calendar_today18-08-2016 14:19:28

221 Tweet

11 Takipçi

30 Takip Edilen

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Diffractive Nonlocal Metasurfaces - Overvig - 2022 - Laser & Photonics Reviews - Wiley Online Library onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

maybe the systematic description of conic sections, & any uses in mathematical physics.. polarisation states, elliptical resonators . perplexity.ai/search/sylvest… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conic_sec… plasmonic hyperbolic materials refocusing evanescent waves as SPPs, many concepts to think about

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I was very surprised to see generative ai {marketing} inside an academic paper online journal source that published in 2012(DL-nn s were 2016). And it was in my pretty niche field (but also Absorbers also came in 2013). So there's either a gap in the lit, or the dates we're wrong

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I'm surprised again, one of the journals ACS is miss- linking attributions to essentially an IOP publication, but 50-50 it links to ACS generated page with that same info from IOP.

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

how are embeddings models PDFs, by the way? any demand for integrating mathpix api, or has it ... i guess i could do it / use it.

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I just saw o3 mini do a really sneaky thing. Which was take the premise of my question and first them print the statement "understanding ... superlattice" INFRONT of my question premise. So this really is a blackbox system exposed.

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Meaning it probably didn't know the answer or knew something better/conventional, but still slid my decent question inorder to probe itself deeper.

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Question for this week. Why did HfO2 vs TiO2 give widely different responses at 1000nm (0.65 vs 0.4) and was the Q factor that diff between the two as claimed (claim was TiO2 narrower). Found however n value defines/ed first peak at 1400nm (or 1350nm for sio2 n=1.45, A=1: vs 0.8)

NTech (@ntech_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sb2S3-Based Dynamically Tuned Color Filter Array via Genetic Algorithm interested because SiN (Al2O3?), RIE color genetic algo, and compatible ALD. And active GST vs Sb2S3. mdpi.com/2079-4991/13/9…