“A government of integrity and service.” Keir Starmer 🤫

This is how our ‘authorities’ think it’s going to be then? Those who believe we should be censored are demanding a fake debate on it and those saying we shouldn’t be censored are, basically, evidence that we should be. Fuck them. They are tyrants.

The last few weeks have been pretty rubbish tbh but this has just put a huge smile on my face.

Here are the three rules of the radical Left: - Nothing is EVER enough. Investment/ legislation. You’ve always been stingy/ not gone far enough. - The more you give, the more they want. - They attack to deflect. The more vicious the attacks, the greater the hypocrisy.

I agree with every word of this, But I suspect there will be a lot of buyers’ remorse among Lab voters. Starmer’s already fast-tracking Honours recommendations.

“He’s a man of integrity. As Head of the CPS he held no sway over the CPS’ decision not to prosecute Savile. As PM he held great sway over who the CPS prosecuted & how swiftly. Bespoke legislation protects his pension while he attacks pensioners. He’s a man of, um, integrity.”

Concerning to hear the Speaker of the Commons lumping 'misinformation' in with 'incitement, threats and intimidation' while talking up the need for greater cross-border censorship. Given that all statements of fact or opinion are provisional, who gets to define 'misinformation',

So tired of these vile attacks on Churchill by Nazi apologists & their historically illiterate lackeys I wrote my MA thesis on Churchill, served on the boards of 2 Churchill societies, studied the Great Man for 30 yrs & was part of Churchill's team for the 2002 final of BBC

Good Morning Britain Rob Rinder She's not on top of her brief. Way overpromoted

James O’Brien perfectly summed up in one tweet.

The FIRS scheme which Labour has seemingly halted would go some way in deterring individuals from engaging in undisclosed foreign influence work, and would increase transparency and awareness of activities of this nature. This would just be a preliminary step in establishing a

I’ve no doubt Social Media is a great thing but I think it can also amplify problems. The immediacy, people’s desperation to get things posted rather than right. Portraying immensely complex issues in overly-simplistic terms. Are we all a small part of the problem?

360 days of sunshine a year and they still didn’t want solar power. They know…..

Why are Good Law Project certain govt will now always behave in accordance with the law? However favourably one might look on Starmer we have no reason to be certain of this. It’s basically an admission they were using the law as an anti Tory campaign tool goodlawproject.org/good-law-pract…

Some people’s desire for control seems to have no bounds…

Can you imagine if the UK had a Prime Minister who put Britain and British people first?

Lab to put tens of thousands of foreign nationals who have gatecrashed Britain without legal authority into scarce social housing. This is an extremist policy against the interests of the British people and deeply corrosive of trust in politics. Disgraceful. Well pursued Tom Harwood

My big question of the week: how do you get Lab & Con (Jointly the primary beneficiaries of an incredibly unjust voting system) to agree to change to a fair voting system that will see them lose hand over fist? Turkeys & Christmas spring to mind.

I didn’t realise ‘deliberately speeding’ was the offence in question. I thought it was ‘speeding.’

That lack of pressure from the international community is very telling. It’s such a painfully obvious route yet… tumbleweed.