Ben Zeisloft End Abortion Ohio Here's a free introductory book to help you better understand these issues: AbortionArguments.com

Jebediah Ben Zeisloft End Abortion Ohio Are you annoyed *if* you read an article or a book and wonder, "Why didn't the author provide me a custom explanation of this?" If not, wise up & realize that people write for efficiency. Another scary webpage for you; the free version is available: a.co/d/1bPr75P

Bishop Ghost of the Australian Realists It may be worth taking a philosophical ethics class. Almost no philosophers who are atheists think ethics is "subjective"--whatever that might mean; indeed probably almost nobody thinks that, again whatever that means: 1000wordphilosophy.com/ethics/#ethica…

Ghost of the Australian Realists She made that point here: the-orbit.net/greta/2014/04/…

Ghost of the Australian Realists Dax Maybe you should ask these folks about whether it could be ok for God to lie to them, or break promises, or send "saved" people to hell. Maybe they'd better engage with any of those. Maybe a helpful short video: tiktok.com/t/ZP8L4rh5A/

When we Christians are more known for our support of presidents than we are for our support of the poor, the immigrant, the marginalized, and the oppressed, that is when we know we are following someone other than Jesus and we have a lot of repenting to do.

Rachel Greep ☕️ Because "a human" sounds like "a human person," as opposed to being merely biologically human or even a biologically human organism: AbortionArguments.com

I Meme You No Harm Rachel Greep ☕️ If you can only "dream up" reasons here, then you should take a class on these topics or read a book: bioethicstoday.org/blog/are-embry…

Rachel Greep ☕️ abortionarguments.com/2020/10/are-fe…

Rachel Greep ☕️ So this is poor reading comprehension. He said his fingernail is human: it's biologically human. He didn't say it's "a human," or a human person. Don't miss this distinction. abortionarguments.com/2020/10/are-fe…

Raymond Luxury Yacht Rachel Greep ☕️ Critics here miss this: He said his fingernail is human: it's biologically human. He didn't say it's "a human," or a human person. Don't miss this distinction. abortionarguments.com/2020/10/are-fe…

It's unfortunate when people don't want to learn about things they are passionate about, in fair and balanced ways.

Morris the Moose Raymond Luxury Yacht Rachel Greep ☕️ No, this is no "comparison." It is simply listening carefully to what is said: "human" as an adjective versus "a human" as a noun are importantly different. Not understanding that is bad: tiktok.com/t/ZP8L4rQMu/

Morris the Moose Raymond Luxury Yacht Rachel Greep ☕️ Learning why you have apparently lost the ability to listen and learn would be good for you: abortionarguments.com/2022/11/extrem…

IrreverentBoomer Rachel Greep ☕️ Your toe is "merely biologically human." I am sorry you pretend to not understand that concept or category. Here are some activities to help you better think about what people are: abortionarguments.com/p/full-text.ht…

LGoody Rachel Greep ☕️ Obviously mammalian bodies start at conception or otherwise early. No informed person who had biology in middle school denies that. That's not the issue here, for multiple reasons: salon.com/2022/04/02/whe…

LGoody Rachel Greep ☕️ If by "biologically human organism," then yes. If by "human person," then no. I encourage you to take a biology class to learn what topics are and are not biological or scientific: bioethicstoday.org/blog/following…

Part of the reason why "debates" are often stupid, when the goal is "winners" and "losers" instead of better understanding for all, winning for all.