LOL so it's just completely fake

Final episode of Season 8 FTW! It's a fantastic conversation between John Jay College colleagues Nathan Lents (Nathan H. Lents) and Olivera Jokić. indoorvoicespodcast.com/2025/05/12/epi…

And Nathan H. Lents is talking about his own book instore this evening! Coincidence? We think not. waterstones.com/events/the-sex… University of Bristol Earth Sciences Martin Booth Bristol Museum & Art Gallery We The Curious

THE SEXUAL EVOLUTION by Nathan H. Lents is out today with Canongate (has left)! A perspective-altering and deeply researched journey through the history of sexuality and gender across the animal kingdom. canongate.co.uk/books/5125-the…

Thanks for the shutout Richard Dawkins. You’ve written another lovely book and it was a pleasure to read and review. Cheers!

On the show today: Nathan H. Lents on gender-fluid animals; The summer solstice; Queer Glasnevin cemetary; Forgiving your son's murderer - the Opera; leslie williams with chinese wine; Sarina Bellissimo with Showbiz News; Dee Molumby reviews '28 Years Later' & 'Elio'

Tell me you don't have even a basic understanding of genomics without admitting you don't have even a basic understanding of genomics.

Purchase the "Human Errors: A Panorama of Our Glitches, From Pointless Bones to Broken Genes" audiobook by 7/30 and save 60%! Nathan H. Lents, and Nathan H. Lents audiobooks.com/promotions/pro…

Many institutions, programs, and individual scientists are stepping back from supporting the efforts to enhance diversity, equity and inclusion. Doing so is a mistake. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…

When a professional internet troll remarks on someone else's "charm." LMAO

ICYMI, we have posted online an excellent essay by Nathan H. Lents demolishing a creationist's attack on a Smithsonian display. As a bonus, the essay provides a concise, perspicuous explanation of genetic similarity. A must read! secularhumanism.org/2025/07/how-si…

A creationist with no training in genetics claims humans and chimps are only 85% similar. Genomicist Nathan H. Lents says that’s not how any of this works. Read the full takedown in Free Inquiry: ow.ly/1EGP50WtJbv

Some argue that humans evolved for monogamy, while other argue that we evolved for non-monogamy. So which is it? Nathan Lents (Nathan H. Lents), author of the new book The Sexual Evolution, is on the show today to dive into the debate. sexandpsychology.com/blog/podcast/e…

We've changed our environments, but not our bodies and now we're studying the consequences. Nathan H. Lents gets to the core of why these illnesses such as Type 2 Diabetes or lower back pain exist and why they require an evolutionary perspective. youtube.com/watch?v=rD1JRd…

Creationists are cherry-picking data, mangling genetics, and even editing figures to fit their narrative. Nathan H. Lents explains what’s really in the ape genome data, and why the Smithsonian is right. Read more in Free Inquiry: secularhumanism.org/2025/08/how-si…

Book Review: "Humans: Perspectives on Our Evolution" thehumanevolutionblog.com/2025/09/25/boo… vía Nathan H. Lents

The Smithsonian was told to change its exhibits: humans and chimps are “only 85% alike.” The source? A creationist lawyer misreading supplementary data. The reality? ~99% similarity, confirmed again and again. From Nathan H. Lents in Free Inquiry: ow.ly/30mA50X5VTh

In case anyone forgot, science isn’t a matter of opinion. Richard Dawkins, Lawrence M. Krauss, and Nathan H. Lents remind us why in the latest Free Inquiry: ow.ly/ITGL50X8Sun Belief doesn’t make facts optional.