Make Pro Cycling Better (@mpcbnow) 's Twitter Profile
Make Pro Cycling Better

@mpcbnow

Thinking of ways to Make Pro Cycling Better for fans, riders & all the people in between one idea at a time.

Here to start a conversation

ID: 1828021417461399553

calendar_today26-08-2024 10:48:31

11 Tweet

32 Followers

107 Following

Make Pro Cycling Better (@mpcbnow) 's Twitter Profile Photo

💡Feed Zones Locations Feed zones locations should be decided by race organisers, following precise UCI guidelines, to save the DS of each team the time and energy of searching for the best feed points... which often end up being all the same anyway. Thoughts?

💡Feed Zones Locations

Feed zones locations should be decided by race organisers, following precise UCI guidelines, to save the DS of each team the time and energy of searching for the best feed points... which often end up being all the same anyway.

Thoughts?
Make Pro Cycling Better (@mpcbnow) 's Twitter Profile Photo

💡Make racing more dynamic Place a bonus "sprint" in the middle part of the race that grants the first five riders to cross the line the same amount of UCI points for 10-14 places for the race/stage. Especially useful on flat stages in stage races to invite attacking racing.

💡Make racing more dynamic

Place a bonus "sprint" in the middle part of the race that grants the first five riders to cross the line the same amount of UCI points for 10-14 places for the race/stage.

Especially useful on flat stages in stage races to invite attacking racing.
Make Pro Cycling Better (@mpcbnow) 's Twitter Profile Photo

All pro teams should publish their riders' race data (power, HR, speed, cadence) within 24H of the race or stage being completed. If not made entirely public, it should at least be transmitted to the UCI so that it can be analysed by a panel of experts.

All pro teams should publish their riders' race data (power, HR, speed, cadence) within 24H of the race or stage being completed.

If not made entirely public, it should at least be transmitted to the UCI so that it can be analysed by a panel of experts.