The moment someone uses the phrase ‘sex-based rights’ you know (1) they don’t understand the Equality Act and (2) someone wrote their speech for them.

Certifiable.

I’ve written a short thread about the ‘For Women Scotland’ case in the UK Supreme Court next week. But you will have to pop over to Blue Sky to read my witterings.

My article in the Independent today. Link over on Blue Sky.

Perhaps Messrs Cass and Streeting can say what they think is wrong with this?

Snake al’Orange tastes horrible - or so I’m told…

Goodbye Twitter.

I had not read this before.

The greatest threat we face is our own silence.

the room next door - Donald Trump Plane Crash Fact Check

Trumpenomics…

This is the future the Supreme Court have visited on the U.K.

The USA might not be the destination of choice for anyone until the regime changes.

Go for it. A case in which the will of Parliament and the ECHR A.3, 8 and 14 rights are read by the court and respected would get us well on the way to have the crackpot SC ruling overturned. Where do I donate?

I would say she is trying to make sense of the SC ruling in For Women Scotland.

Following the Supreme Court judgement, King's College Cambridge has changed its signage to comply with the law. Cc SpeakOutSister