Join ARI and top AI and policy experts for a virtual panel on the Trump Administration's AI Action Plan. On July 24, at 1PM ET, our panel including Jack Clark, Samuel Hammond 🦉, Elham Tabassi, and stewartbaker will dig into the Admin's plan. RSVP: zoom.us/webinar/regist…

A strong and utterly persuasive letter from Rep. John Moolenaar against the Trump Administration's acquiescence in the sale of H20s to China. This really is an own-goal if you're serious about competition with PRC. But maybe we aren't serious about this.

NEW: Twenty national security experts and former officials are calling on Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick to block the sale of H20 chips to China. "China’s next generation of frontier AI will be built on the backs of the H20," warns the coalition. Letter: ari.us/letter-to-secr…

Congratulations Team USA on winning the International Physics Olympiad — and the only team to win five Gold Medals! 🇺🇸💪🥇 Come visit us at the The White House. WHOSTP47 would love to host you! American Institute of Physics aapt.org/aboutaapt/U-S-…

My report in today's Politico Pro Morning Tech, "The Stick, the Carrot, and the Net," analyzes three policy approaches to addressing AI agent harms: tort liability, liability safe harbors, and no-fault compensation schemes. Find the full article below!

Great piece by Oren Cass and Chris McGuire on the need for a robust export control policy on advanced AI chip sales to China -- thank you for making a rigorous case! washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/…

So reading about water usage in AI datacenters, I see the meme that we shouldn't care (Séb Krier, @andymasley). I'm just trying to figure out the numbers. So it looks like the US consumes 322 billion gallons of water a day. Datacenter usage (more than AI) appears to be, at the

Nvidia investing $100B in OpenAI!!! This is wild for so many reasons: - 10GW AI training runs... probably with models 20x-100x larger than GPT-5. We knew this was going to come, and we still don't have any updates on timeline. How many years the $100B is over is also unclear -

AI law preemption is the sequel to Section 230 that nobody asked for. In a new op-ed for Tech Policy Press, Brad Carson writes that preemption doubles down on the same old mistakes, shielding Big Tech from accountability as new online harms emerge: techpolicy.press/a-new-section-…

ICYMI: Strong move by the Trump Administration today on export controls ⬇️ nytimes.com/2025/09/29/bus…

"If you see something, say something" shouldn't risk your career. REGISTER NOW for a virtual panel on AI whistleblower protections with Jacob Hilton, Holly Alpine, Jennifer Gibson (Psst.org), and Sophie Luskin from Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto. zoom.us/webinar/regist…

New bill text, same mission: The GAIN AI Act would ensure US companies have access to advanced AI chips before they’re sold to countries of concern. ARI’s Mitchell Kominsky discusses the bill's path forward with Bloomberg Government. Important progress towards getting this passed in the NDAA.

🚨New American Compass paper on an America First export-control policy for chips and chip-making equipment: Stop Selling the Rope. Definitive assessment of the state of play, Chinese aims, and how to do policy in the national rather than corporate interest: americancompass.org/stop-selling-t…

Indeed

Chairman Rep. John Moolenaar on the GAIN AI Act: "The GAIN AI Act will guarantee that no American company is ever put behind a foreign adversary buyer for advanced AI chips. This is an America First Chip Policy in action that will build sustained American AI dominance.”

Glad to have signed this letter. The policies in Senator Jim Banks’ GAIN AI Act are quintessentially America First 🇺🇸 Given the shortage of high-end chips, the transformative nature of AI, and the need for the United States to win this tech race — companies like Nvidia should

National security experts support the passage of Senator Jim Banks’ and Rep. John Moolenaar’s GAIN AI act, a critical measure to ensure that the US wins the global AI race and bolsters our national security

“This is being rushed” is the last refuge of anyone who opposes common sense national security laws when they can't find a substantive objection. It happened with the TikTok bill last year, and it’s happening again now with Senator Jim Banks’ GAIN AI Act. “We should sell advanced AI

The funny thing about the AI populist backlash thing is that it was widely expected by people in the field for a while, and often cited as a reason to get ahead of regulation/economic impacts etc. It is often the newcomers from crypto etc. who are more surprised…

This is a very sensible (conservative) analysis of the brewing "we'll do watered down kid's safety legislation in exchange for an AI amnesty." It's a bad deal, not worth taking. dailysignal.com/2025/11/26/don…