Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile
Michael T Stuart

@miikeessttuuart

philosophy of science, philosophy of imagination, artificial intelligence, ethics of science

ID: 1156414929584492544

linkhttp://michaeltstuart.com calendar_today31-07-2019 04:02:59

200 Tweet

1,1K Followers

1,1K Following

UoY Philosophy (@uoyphilosophy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

On April 8th, Mike Stuart will be speaking at the HKUST Philosophy of Science Lecture Series. He will argue that "pragmatic understanding" is the most fundamental kind of understanding, and it should be characterized in terms of abilities. Zoom details in the image!

On April 8th, Mike Stuart will be speaking at the HKUST Philosophy of Science Lecture Series. He will argue that "pragmatic understanding" is the most fundamental kind of understanding, and it should be characterized in terms of abilities. Zoom details in the image!
UoY Philosophy (@uoyphilosophy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

On April 12th, Mike Stuart is giving a talk to the European Space Agency's Advanced Concept Team. The talk will be on imagination, creativity, and AI for space science. Learn more here! esa.int/gsp/ACT/coffee…

On April 12th, Mike Stuart is giving a talk to the European Space Agency's Advanced Concept Team. The talk will be on imagination, creativity, and AI for space science. Learn more here! esa.int/gsp/ACT/coffee…
UoY Philosophy (@uoyphilosophy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

On Thursday, Mike Stuart will be giving a talk at the University of Stockholm entitled "Scientific Understanding as Ability." He'll argue that understanding is just having an ability (and being responsible for having that ability).

On Thursday, Mike Stuart will be giving a talk at the University of Stockholm entitled "Scientific Understanding as Ability." He'll argue that understanding is just having an ability (and being responsible for having that ability).
Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Cool new paper that replicates and expands on the work by Markus Kneer and me! dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.114… Roughly, we're seeing more empirical evidence that if you attribute mental properties to AI, you are also more likely to attribute responsibility to them.

Alisa Bokulich ➡️ 🦋🌤️ (@alisabokulich) 's Twitter Profile Photo

UPSS scholars in Mentoring Program who are current grad students or w/in 3 years PhD are eligible to submit an abstract for UPSS Session at upcoming Philosophy of Science Association Meeting. UPSS scholars work with their mentors to refine project. Deadline submit August 1st mms.philsci.org/ct.php?lid=279…

UPSS scholars in Mentoring Program who are current grad students or w/in 3 years PhD are eligible to submit an abstract for UPSS Session at upcoming <a href="/PhilSciAssoc/">Philosophy of Science Association</a>  Meeting. UPSS scholars work with their mentors to refine project. Deadline submit August 1st
mms.philsci.org/ct.php?lid=279…
UoY Philosophy (@uoyphilosophy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In a few hours, Mike Stuart will be giving a talk to the European Intergovernmental Research Organisation forum on scientific imagination and creativity. See here for more: eiroforum.org EIROforum Michael T Stuart

UoY Philosophy (@uoyphilosophy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mike Stuart will be in conversation with Rashaad Newsome at the Sainsbury Art Centre this Wednesday on the topic of imagination and AI in art. More info here! sainsburycentre.ac.uk/whats-on/artis…

Mike Stuart will be in conversation with Rashaad Newsome at the Sainsbury Art Centre this Wednesday on the topic of imagination and AI in art. More info here! sainsburycentre.ac.uk/whats-on/artis…
Amy Kind (@amykind) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can AI imagine? Mike Stuart argues that because imagination is an essentially contested concept, we are never going to agree on an answer to the question... but nonetheless, there might be good reasons to keep asking it.

Anatolii Kozlov (@_anatoliikozlov) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can artistic exercises empower scientists into creative forms of science communication? Super-pumped about ours with Helene Scott workshop and discussion with scientists today at Cambridge University Clare Hall! Cambridge HPS

Can artistic exercises empower scientists into creative forms of science communication? Super-pumped about ours with <a href="/HScottFordsmand/">Helene Scott</a> workshop and discussion with scientists today at <a href="/Cambridge_Uni/">Cambridge University</a> Clare Hall! 

<a href="/CambridgeHPS/">Cambridge HPS</a>
Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Delighted to be part of this special issue on qualitative methods used to study science (alongside superstars Nancy Nersessian, Sabina Leonelli, Rachel Ankeny, Lisa Osbeck, and others), commemorating Ian Mitroff's work on the moon landing. t.ly/1twvt

Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is some of the most fun I've ever had writing a paper, with Anatolii Kozlov. So happy to have it come out open-access with EJPS. Epistemology-via-aesthetics and vice-versa ftw!

Anatolii Kozlov (@_anatoliikozlov) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So! – Are scientific reports stories, arguments, or –? We unpack their epistemology via recent works on narratives. We then put on a perspectivists' hat (e.g. of great Michela Massimi) to show that they are just like... modernist stories Michael T Stuart link.springer.com/article/10.100…

CĂ©line Henne (@celinehenne) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Not all inquiries are like whodunnits, uncovering the pre-existing facts that provide the answers to our questions. Sometimes, we need to create or revise the frameworks that delineate the very object of our inquiry. That is a creative act, from beginning to end!

Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In this paper I try my best to cover all the exciting xphi work that has been done on imagination and creativity, and give a wish-list of things that might be done next! philsci-archive.pitt.edu/23798/

Michael T Stuart (@miikeessttuuart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can some scientists "imagine better" than others? What would that even mean? Hannah Sargeant and I argue that imagination is all about breaking constraints, and imagining well is about being careful about which constraints you break, and how. t.ly/Aticr

Can some scientists "imagine better" than others? What would that even mean? <a href="/Dr_Hannah_Sarge/">Hannah Sargeant</a> and I argue that imagination is all about breaking constraints, and imagining well is about being careful about which constraints you break, and how. t.ly/Aticr