Mellohi (@mellohi_enwikt) 's Twitter Profile
Mellohi

@mellohi_enwikt

Amateur linguist interested in Old Irish and other language families like Japonic and Berber.

Avid Wiktionary and Wikipedia editor for Proto-Celtic.

ID: 1319708195972145157

calendar_today23-10-2020 18:32:20

607 Tweet

150 Followers

38 Following

Mellohi (@mellohi_enwikt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Going back to this one, I presume that with the loss of productivity of i-reduplicated presents, Celtic speakers would fail to segment yeig-e/o- as one and thus reform an e-grade s-subjunctive as if to a root *yeig-.

Mellohi (@mellohi_enwikt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hello eDIL, I found another typo in it: In the citation for the quote "croicni alta", the citation to ZCP should say ZCP xxx (i.e. vol. 30) not xx (i.e. vol. 20).

Hello <a href="/eDIL_Dictionary/">eDIL</a>, I found another typo in it:
In the citation for the quote "croicni alta", the citation to ZCP should say ZCP xxx (i.e. vol. 30) not xx (i.e. vol. 20).
Mellohi (@mellohi_enwikt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A curious thought about yet another EDPC entry David Stifter 🍵📄🦊 Dr. Jörgenstein, is it possible that koret- here could be a -ets derivative of *kor- "putting, throwing", instead of a substrate borrowing?

A curious thought about yet another EDPC entry <a href="/ChronHib/">David Stifter 🍵📄🦊</a> <a href="/AndersRJorg/">Dr. Jörgenstein</a>, is it possible that koret- here could be a -ets derivative of *kor- "putting, throwing", instead of a substrate borrowing?