Very cool to have been able to contribute to planning this study we've just pre-registered. Quite ambitious, but given the small expected effects we've tried to be a thorough as possible in sample size determination and the statistical approach - osf.io/9sgjk

Prevalence of insufficient physical activity: 2000: 23% 2010: 26% 2022: 31% doi.org/10.1016/S2214-…

Hey everyone! I'm currently at risk of redundancy and so am on the lookout for opportunities to explore my options including outside academia. So, if anyone has any opportunities, thinks they'd hire me, or just ideas for me, please DM me. Thanks, and do share this.

New #PeerReviewed preprint on the specifics of valuing effort & preference for mental and physical effort. -Peer-reviewed preprint: osf.io/preprints/psya… -Recommendation: doi.org/10.24072/pci.h…

I have to readjust to France and remember to ask for a LARGE coffee, otherwise …

Delighted to share our latest paper on clinical prediction models Adrian Barnett Gary Collins 🇪🇺 David Borg Rex Parsons We looked at models registered on clinicaltrials.gov and publication outcomes From ~1000 records < 1 in 3 were published within 10 years jclinepi.com/article/S0895-…

new preprint by Thibault et al examineds widespread use (and misuse) of G*power by researchers medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

Hello friends and foes are you ready for some effect size standardisation discourse well too bad because you're getting it anyway! (unless you scroll away please don't) Quick thread on a new commentary-like preprint with Protzko @protzko.bsky.social, Daniël Lakens, Malte Elson, & Ruben C. Arslan

In sports science, the use of G*power is very common to calculate sample sizes. In my experience (editor and reviewer), there are often not enough details to reproduce it, or the parameters used are unreasonable and/or not justified. I recommend the article and the thread below.

📊✨ Assessing scientific merit goes beyond journal metrics! The CIHR College of Reviewers created a new infographic packed with tips to help peer reviewers strengthen their skills. Check it out and refine your #PeerReview! cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/53977.html?h…

When your preprint is peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community In, don't forget to cite the recommendation in your manuscript if you submit it to a journal other than Peer Community Journal.

“Best Paper” awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science led by the brilliant Losia Lagisz!

Authors are increasingly paying to publish their papers open access. But is it fair or sustainable? science.org/content/articl…

Ever wondered how Registered Reports differ from the regular literature? Some great work has been done on this (eg by Anne Scheel Daniël Lakens Courtney Soderberg) & I'd like to also highlight recent work of Aoife O'Mahony whose PhD thesis you can download here! orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/1676…

Researchers are willing to trade their results for journal prestige: results from a discrete choice experiment. doi.org/10.31219/osf.i…

Why I’ve removed journal titles from the papers on my CV nature.com/articles/d4158…

47.6% of people who intended to be physically active failed to translate this into action. doi.org/10.1136/bjspor…

Physical activity levels before a stroke are predictive of post-stroke functional dependence, in this new work from Matthieu Boisgontier and colleagues: academic.oup.com/ptj/advance-ar… ANPT_Stroke SIG APTAAcademyofNeuroPT

💡 #preprints increase the visibility of your work! 👁️7 million abstracts views/month 📰 3 million downloads/month 📑 36% increase in citations ☑️ 30,000 Tweets/month mention and discuss preprints 📨 37% of bioRxiv users receive feedback from the community

Side projects always end up requiring as much work & time as main projects. I hope my future self remembers that. #SlowScience We are very proud of this one, it was a lot of fun & learning. Special thanks to the great reviewers PTJ: Journal of APTA!