Douglas Lute (@lutedoug) 's Twitter Profile
Douglas Lute

@lutedoug

Former US Ambassador to NATO; Lieutenant General, US Army (Retired)

ID: 3251945207

calendar_today13-05-2015 16:01:02

335 Tweet

1,1K Takipçi

877 Takip Edilen

Daniel Fried (@ambdanfried) 's Twitter Profile Photo

And now remove caveats on Ukraine’s use of weapons. Ukraine should be bound, as we are all bound, by the laws of war. Those caveats are sufficient. More caveats are excessive. Douglas Lute

Atlantic Council (@atlanticcouncil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What are your thoughts on the deliverables for 🇺🇦 Ukraine? Asks Atlantic Council Europe Center’s Rachel Rizzo. “The bridge metaphor works in part, but I’m not sure it’s completely satisfactory,” says former US Ambassador to NATO Douglas Lute. Watch the #NATOPublicForum: ➡️ bit.ly/4byBGwR

Mark Hertling (@markhertling) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I agree (to a degree) with my old boss Admiral James Stavridis, USN, Ret. and unfortunately disagree with my dear friend Douglas Lute. The support from both Department of Defense 🇺🇸, NATO & others in helping Ukraine build & then support an army they did not have in Feb 22 has been nothing short of miraculous.

Douglas Lute (@lutedoug) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I accept that the support to Ukraine has been huge, but that doesn’t mean it has been enough. I do not believe there is any deliberate intent to produce stalemate, but stalemate is the effect.

John Herbst (@johnedherbst) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Hertling Admiral James Stavridis, USN, Ret. Douglas Lute Department of Defense 🇺🇸 NATO Impressive group of defense thinkers. The Biden Administration’s response to Putin’s aggression has prevented an Ukraine’s defeat, but not enabled its victory. Stavridis is right that victory is still possible, but only if, as Lute argues, US policy becomes bolder.

CFR Preventive Action (@cfr_cpa) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Biden administration's decision to loosen restrictions on the use of U.S.-supplied long-range missiles provides an opportunity for Ukraine to make strategic gains in its war with Russia, writes Douglas Lute in a new CFR Preventive Action policy brief. Read more: on.cfr.org/49jR3ty

CFR Preventive Action (@cfr_cpa) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Douglas Lute wrote the first Ukraine Policy Brief for Council on Foreign Relations's Special Initiative on Securing Ukraine's Future. Read about how the United States can support Ukraine in isolating the Russian military with a campaign of long-range strikes: on.cfr.org/49jR3ty

Teri Schultz (@terischultz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

That's not true. Every US president has demanded European gov'ts spend more on their own defense albeit evidently too politely. It IS true Trump likely spurred some increased funding faster but he didn't reverse the decline -- Putin did that in 2014. 2/2

Douglas Lute (@lutedoug) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Right. The president most responsible for 10 consecutive years of real increases in NATO defense spending is Putin — not Obama, Trump or Biden. Data shows that the rate of increase for many allies actually decreased under Trump.

Teri Schultz (@terischultz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

For countries like Germany, for the government to appear it was increasing its defense spending because of Trump's pressure was highly unpopular, even when Germans KNEW they needed to ramp up of their own accord.

Douglas Lute (@lutedoug) 's Twitter Profile Photo

America’s allies are the greatest strategic advantage we hold over competitors Russia and China. Draw allies closer, don’t push them away.

Peter Ricketts (@lordrickettsp) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Where do we stand after the opening night of Trump does Ukraine? The first glimpse of substance from Hegseth suggests huge concessions will be demanded from Kyiv with no sign of similar pressure on Moscow - rather the reverse, with Trump running hard after Putin. Bottom line? 1/7