Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile
Kim Phillips

@k_l_phillips

Christian. hebraist. in. progress
Research Fellow at Institute for Hebrew Bible Manuscript Research
Research Associate at Taylor-Schechter Genizah Research Unit

ID: 1112811584492064768

linkhttps://1000words.academia.edu/KimPhillips calendar_today01-04-2019 20:18:51

1,1K Tweet

1,1K Followers

197 Following

Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Zechariah... phew! A tricky book. First things first: how to memorise the order of the visions: סוסים קרנות חבל-מדה יהושע מנורה רשעה מרכבות First letters: סק חי מורם 'Sackcloth. Alive. Raised up'. Not a bad summary of chapters 1-8 to the exiles: Repent! Live! Be raised up!

Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In light of recent chat here about memorising #Psalm93, here it is from one of the most important #Bible #manuscripts from the Babylonian #masoretic tradition: the Berlin Codex. And here's a key, in case it's helpful: Masora - red Accents - blue Vowels - black dagesh - green

In light of recent chat here about memorising #Psalm93, here it is from one of the most important #Bible #manuscripts from the Babylonian #masoretic tradition: the Berlin Codex.

And here's a key, in case it's helpful:
Masora - red 
Accents - blue
Vowels - black
dagesh - green
Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I'm working from a new/the only coffee shop in #Northstowe today. There are several other people with laptops, tapping away, a mums and tots group in a room upstairs, more mums chatting away downstairs. A few dogs (with owners). It's very pleasant =) #wouldrecommend.

Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Possibly my favourite commentator. He's SO sensitive to the nuances of the text - especially poetic imagery. DYK: he didn't write anything until he was 50! ...But then, when he first put quill to parchment, he wrote the most influential Hebrew grammar for the next 500 years...

Kim Phillips (@k_l_phillips) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Lovely detail: The scribe was aiming to say 'we stayed with them 7 days'. They had a choice of two prepositions for the 'with them' part: 'ammehon or gabbehon. But they got mixed up and wrote something in between: gammehon. A mistake from 1500 years ago, but #canrelate!

Lovely detail:
The scribe was aiming to say 'we stayed with them 7 days'.

They had a choice of two prepositions for the 'with them' part: 'ammehon or gabbehon. 

But they got mixed up and wrote something in between: gammehon.

A mistake from 1500 years ago, but #canrelate!