Jianli Tao(@jianli_tao) 's Twitter Profileg
Jianli Tao

@jianli_tao

Instructor in @chiarlelab at @BostonChildrens and @harvardmed focusing on CRISPR-Cas9, retrotransposons, and genomic instability

ID:876364611045343232

linkhttp://chiarle.tch.harvard.edu/content/jianli-tao-phd calendar_today18-06-2017 09:03:00

22 Tweets

136 Followers

308 Following

Boston Children's(@BostonChildrens) 's Twitter Profile Photo

CRISPR holds huge therapeutic promise. How good are the various CRISPR tools, and how safe? In this review, our own Jianli Tao, Daniel Bauer & Roberto Chiarle summarize the capabilities and limitations of each: ms.spr.ly/6018eAGpn

CRISPR #geneediting holds huge therapeutic promise. How good are the various CRISPR tools, and how safe? In this review, our own @jianli_tao, @danielevanbauer & Roberto Chiarle summarize the capabilities and limitations of each: ms.spr.ly/6018eAGpn
account_circle
BCH Innovation News(@BCH_Innovation) 's Twitter Profile Photo

tools compared: In this review in Nature Communications, Jianli Tao, Daniel Bauer & Roberto Chiarle look at CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12/Cas13 nucleases, DNA base editors, prime editors, and RNA base editors and offer considerations for therapeutic gene editing. ms.spr.ly/6010eAGZi

#CRISPR tools compared: In this review in @NatureComms, @jianli_tao, @danielevanbauer & Roberto Chiarle look at CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12/Cas13 nucleases, DNA base editors, prime editors, and RNA base editors and offer considerations for therapeutic gene editing. ms.spr.ly/6010eAGZi
account_circle
Nature Communications(@NatureComms) 's Twitter Profile Photo

.Jianli Tao Daniel Bauer Chiarle lab review the development of CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, and prime editors, as well as their editing precision, off-target effects, and clinical considerations

go.nature.com/3XKXC1u

account_circle
CRISP_SCIENCE(@ScienceCrisp) 's Twitter Profile Photo

REVIEW 'Assessing and advancing the safety of -Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing'
Tao J Jianli Tao, Bauer DE, Chiarle R.
Nat Commun. 2023-01-13. (10 pages, 247 references)
doi.org/10.1038/s41467…

REVIEW 'Assessing and advancing the safety of #CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing' Tao J @jianli_tao, Bauer DE, Chiarle R. Nat Commun. 2023-01-13. (10 pages, 247 references) doi.org/10.1038/s41467…
account_circle
Jianli Tao(@jianli_tao) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thank you David and Peter, to include our work in this amazing review. The message is 'DSBs generated by nucleases can cause large deletions, chromosomal translocations, chromothripsis, retrotransposon insertion and activation of p53, which can enrich oncogenic cells.'

account_circle
Phys.org(@physorg_com) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A potential danger of gene editing—and why base editing may be safer @bostonchildrens Nature Communications doi.org/gqf9x7 phys.org/news/2022-07-p…

account_circle
David R. Liu(@davidrliu) 's Twitter Profile Photo

New work by @Jianli_tao et al. compare insertions of LINE-1 retrotransposons in human cells during editing by CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease, base editors, and prime editors. They observe >2,500 de novo L1 insertions from Cas9 nuclease, but few from CBE, ABE, or PE.
nature.com/articles/s4146…

account_circle
Chiarle lab(@chiarlelab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Our work on LINE-1 insertions at CRISPR editing sites is already out! Congratulations to Jianli Tao (Jianli Tao) and Qi Wang (@flying_gene) Chiarle lab. Many thanks to our collaborators from Kathleen Helen Burns to help to make it possible.

account_circle