The 'tell' here is the 'terrible'. There are no semi-serious arguments for that. I guess you can argue the filibuster really does serves a deliberative function, forcing coalition-building? Eh? But Madison-style democracy - majority rules - should be no one's idea of 'terrible'.

‘Tlaib did not say what we said she said, but she has not clarified what she meant by saying what she did, despite us not clarifying how her saying what she did say needs clarification, so we are going to stand by saying she said what she didn’t.’

I haven't seen this Cornwell before 🤯🤯🤯🤯 The Den of Iniquity, The Valley of the Giants 1918 36" x 27" Oil on canvas Published in The Red Book Magazine, June 1918, vol. 31, issue 2, pages 30-39 via: illustratedgallery.com/artwork/origin…

Normal elephant.

Patron saint of glaring.

It's notable R's are not exactly rushing to deny - or expressing outrage at - this report that Romney is reluctant to endorse Harris due to fears of violence. Terrorism gets results? washingtonpost.com/elections/2024…

There's a reason why executive, judiciary and performative are not the three branches, filibuster notwithstanding.

Does anyone have any idea what Israel thinks it's doing?