Jeff Leader (@jeff_leader) 's Twitter Profile
Jeff Leader

@jeff_leader

ID: 453219745

calendar_today02-01-2012 18:11:43

165,165K Tweet

872 Followers

2,2K Following

Sara Wahedi (@sarawahedi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A colleague in Afghanistan shared a terrifying realization with me today: “Nearly 4 years without school, learning is a thing of the past. Some girls say they feel too depressed to study. Or they are busy with housework. We may struggle to find girls ready, or able, to learn.”

Baseball by BSmile (@bsmile) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today In 1989: Cincinnati #Reds outfielder Paul O'Neill makes an all-time classic play vs. the Philadelphia #Phillies when he bobbles and then kicks the baseball back to first base! ⚾️ #MLB #Baseball #History

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Suppose, then, that a diamond could be crystallized in the midst of a cushion of soft cotton, and should remain there until it was finally burned up. Would it be false to say that that diamond was soft? This seems a foolish question, and would be so, in fact, /1

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

except in the realm of logic. There such questions are often of the greatest utility as serving to bring logical principles into sharper relief than real discussions ever could. /2x

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In studying logic we must not put them aside with hasty answers, but must consider them with attentive care, in order to make out the principles involved.

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We may, in the present case, modify our question, and ask what prevents us from saying that all hard bodies remain perfectly soft until they are touched, when their hardness increases with the pressure until they are scratched. Reflection will show that the reply is this: /1

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

there would be no falsity in such modes of speech. They would involve a modification of our present usage of speech with regard to the words hard and soft, but not of their meanings. For they represent no fact to be different from what it is; /2

C. S. Peirce (@cspeircespeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This leads us to remark that the question of what would occur under circumstances which do not actually arise is not a question of fact, but only of the most perspicuous arrangement of them.