Jason A. Staples (@jasonstaples) 's Twitter Profile
Jason A. Staples

@jasonstaples

Ass. Teaching Prof @NCState | Paul & Israel: amzn.to/3O2llss | Idea of Israel: amzn.to/38XxCto | Opinions my children’s | Sports: @DocStaples

ID: 15207688

linkhttp://www.jasonstaples.com/ calendar_today23-06-2008 14:44:19

24,24K Tweet

3,3K Followers

417 Following

John Barach (@john_barach) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Michael F. Bird Jason A. Staples This view (Babylon = Jerusalem) is held by many commentators, including Abauzit, Herder, Züllig, Desprez, Russell, Terry, Milligan, Beagley, Ford, Provan, van der Waal, D. Holwerda, Malina, Barker, Michaels, Campbell, Nigel Turner, Chilton, Jordan, Gentry, and Leithart. 2/

Noah Smith 🐇 (@noahpinion) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Humanities aren't inherently easier than STEM. America just uses humanities as a dumping ground for our lower-skilled students, because the subjective nature of the grading makes it easier for teachers to get away with giving students good grades for shitty work.

Matt O'Reilly (@mporeilly) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Is Irresistible Grace really what Romans 9 is about? Or does Calvinism miss the point? In this eye-opening convo, Jason A. Staples joins me to rethink one of the Bible's most debated chapters. What if Paul isn’t talking about unconditional election to heaven or hell—but

Is Irresistible Grace really what Romans 9 is about? Or does Calvinism miss the point?

In this eye-opening convo, <a href="/jasonstaples/">Jason A. Staples</a>  joins me to rethink one of the Bible's most debated chapters. 

What if Paul isn’t talking about unconditional election to heaven or hell—but
Stephen C. Carlson (@sccarlson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My article on the Papias testimonium about Mark is now out, open access, in HTR! (Link to follow.) In this piece, I interrogate the multilayered tradition about its composition and explore why authorship was imposed on it against its writer’s intent to remain anonymous.

My article on the Papias testimonium about Mark is now out, open access, in HTR! (Link to follow.) 

In this piece, I interrogate the multilayered tradition about its composition and explore why authorship was imposed on it against its writer’s intent to remain anonymous.
NanaG. (@emjharris2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

middleclassparty Let's answer some of these... 1. Unless you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth, you struggled. Especially those of us working in manufacturing at hourly rates. My first paycheck at a good FT job in 1979 was $128.62 after taxes. 40 hr week. $3.62 pr hour. I worked 3rd

David Decosimo (@daviddecosimo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I honestly do not know if academics are capable of leaving behind race & sex discrimination in hiring. It's been so deeply ingrained for so long & there are so many ways to keep doing it while pretending not to. And some would rather see the whole ship go down than give it up.

David Decosimo (@daviddecosimo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's possible, of course, that attempted cures could be as destructive as the disease or serve as a pretext for equally illiberal, antimeritocratic projects. But things really are very, very bad on this front. Rigorous, fair federal prosecution in the courts seems the best hope.

Jackie Chea ⚖️ (@fair_and_biased) 's Twitter Profile Photo

middleclassparty 1.) Where do you ppl talking about $7 eggs live? Here in TX, you can get them for normal prices. 2.) My grandma literally had to eat dandelion soup from flowers she and her siblings picked in the park in the Great Depression. My mom ate “hot dog stew” as a child bc it was

<a href="/middle_class_us/">middleclassparty</a> 1.) Where do you ppl talking about $7 eggs live? Here in TX, you can get them for normal prices.

2.) My grandma literally had to eat dandelion soup from flowers she and her siblings picked in the park in the Great Depression. 

My mom ate “hot dog stew” as a child bc it was
Chris Kugler (@chrisryankugler) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Penal Substitutionary Atonement discourse going wild again. So, I’ve not read *all* of Andrew Rillera’s book (but he’s manifestly a much more serious biblical scholar than some of those weighing in on the convo), but this is the key point I’d want to make:

Chris Kugler (@chrisryankugler) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Appreciating this point is crucial to understanding so much of the NT’s theology, theological anthropology, hamartiology, soteriology, and theology of justice. The only proper object of purely punitive (ie non-restorative) justice is Sin itself, which in any case turns out to be

Paul T. Sloan (@paulthomasloan) 's Twitter Profile Photo

since PSA and Rillera’s book are part of the discourse rn, it’s a good time to mention that in *Jesus and the Law of Moses* (out Aug 19) I have a chapter on the cross where I argue for a penal/wrath component to the cross *and* engage Rillera’s very good book in the process.

Andrew Rillera (@andrewrillera) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Reminder to read more than one verse at a time. The "forsakenness" here is an allusion to Ps 22:1, which Jesus cites in Mark 15:34//Matt 27:46. Jesus isn't prooftexting, he's pointing to the entire psalm. And in Ps 22:24 we learn that God has not in fact forsaken the psalmist.