1a3orn I'd also love to see this. If you, someone you know, or someone else reading this is interested in playing the skeptical side of this, I could try my best to play matchmaker. And FWIW this sort of work is in-scope for our RFP (though I agree it would be better to have other

Cool new RFP from Schmidt Sciences; apply by Apr 30! schmidtsciences.org/ai-safety-scie…

⏰ one week left to apply for our capability evaluations RFP! applications close april 1st, and it takes ~1 hour to submit an EOI. some project ideas i'm especially excited about in this thread (🧵)

One day left folks! It’s only 300 words to apply, you can apply multiple times, you can apply now and write the full proposal later, go go go

more funding opportunities in AI safety LFG

Reminder that the nonprofit AI safety field (or "industrial complex" lol) is massively, massively outgunned by, well… The Actual AI Industry. archive.is/DFvLR

xAI launched Grok 4 without any documentation of their safety testing. This is reckless and breaks with industry best practices followed by other major AI labs. If xAI is going to be a frontier AI developer, they should act like one. 🧵

Kelsey Piper osmarks I know we say this a lot but "billionaire uses AI to create clingy anime girlfriend targetting lonely men" would be considered an embarassingly unsubtle cyberpunk plot a few years ago

seems like an important job

In 2024, OP's Technical AI Safety team had 2 grantmakers and spent $40m. In 2025, we had 3 and spent $130m. If you join the team, it will enable us to spend even more next year, and we’ll be directly influenced by your takes. Come work with me!