Jacob Gold (@jacob__gold) 's Twitter Profile
Jacob Gold

@jacob__gold

I didn't realize that if you leave your account deactivated for 30 days it gets deleted

ID: 1895662368719585280

calendar_today01-03-2025 02:28:36

1 Tweet

4 Followers

38 Following

Greg Foster (@gregmfoster) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Spoke at Ai4 - Artificial Intelligence Conferences about something we see daily at Graphite: writing code isn’t the bottleneck - review is. AI accelerates the inner loop; the outer loop now needs superpowers

Spoke at <a href="/Ai4Conferences/">Ai4 - Artificial Intelligence Conferences</a> about something we see daily at Graphite: writing code isn’t the bottleneck - review is. AI accelerates the inner loop; the outer loop now needs superpowers
Merrill Lutsky (@merrilllutsky) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today we're releasing Graphite Chat. The pull request is now where you build, not where you wait. Welcome to the new standard for code review.

Greg Foster (@gregmfoster) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The office this morning as we prepped to launch Graphite Chat. Nothing beats the feeling of shipping with the team after months of hard work!

The office this morning as we prepped to launch Graphite Chat. Nothing beats the feeling of shipping with the team after months of hard work!
Zack Jackson (@scriptedalchemy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Graphite This feature is painful to live without once you start using it. When I first heard about it I thought 'chat in pr review doesn't sound that useful' - never been so wrong in my life. I despise dealing with PRs on repos that dont have graphite chat now 😅 saves so much time.

Zack Jackson (@scriptedalchemy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

PR bots are noisy. Claude CLI and Cursor fetch comments but iteration is clumsy. Graphite let me chat through the PR, comment from my phone, and preview changes without cluttering GitHub. In AI workflows, review becomes the IDE; the last mile happens there.

Anton Babenko 🇺🇦 (@antonbabenko) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I've been testing Graphite chat on Terraform AWS modules PRs for 2 days. Asked if a PR was good to go, it gave a detailed and correct review. Some features feel smoother than Cursor IDE. Looks promising for Terraform workflows.

I've been testing <a href="/withgraphite/">Graphite</a> chat on Terraform AWS modules PRs for 2 days. Asked if a PR was good to go, it gave a detailed and correct review. Some features feel smoother than Cursor IDE. Looks promising for Terraform workflows.
Jacob Gold (@jacob__gold) 's Twitter Profile Photo

graphite has been an in-person company since the beginning. it's awesome. it does mean that we've been missing out on a bunch of non-nyc-based talent. know anyone who would want to work at graphite, if we had an office in SF? DMs are open

Graphite (@withgraphite) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You can now ask Graphite to explain your reviewers' comments in just one-click. Hover over any comment → hit "Add to chat" → ask Graphite literally anything

Braintrust (@braintrustdata) 's Twitter Profile Photo

How do you build reliable AI tools at scale? Graphite 's solution: systemic evaluation. See how Graphite said goodbye to ad-hoc manual testing and leverages Braintrust to ship features like their AI code reviewer, Diamond: braintrust.dev/blog/graphite?…

Graphite (@withgraphite) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You can now access your codebase right from your pull requests. Graphite Chat lets you preview and apply code changes without switching back to your IDE.

Jacob Gold (@jacob__gold) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"stacked prs" are not "stacks". you can have a stack of prs, or multiple stacks of prs. you certainly don't have a stack of stacks (unless you're using our merge queue i guess). you don't split a pr into stacks, you split it into a stack. stop getting this wrong. i am bothered.