🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Happy New Year! These were the four most popular Bad Legal Takes of 2023. Now you get to pick your favorite:

Constitutional to boot

Bad Legal Takes Is it just me or is a response to The First Amendment always in the annual top four?

JUST FILED: FIRE sides with NRA, ACLU in First Amendment Supreme Court case In a new friend-of-the-court filing, FIRE asks the Supreme Court to rule that government officials cannot censor protected speech by punishing speakers’ associates. The First Amendment does not let

I protect your right not to be compelled to produce sexual-content ratings for books.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You might not like The Satanic Temple. You might not think it counts as a religion. But if people's rights depended on others' support for their beliefs, none of our rights would be safe. Iowa's proposed ban targeting satanic displays on state property is unconstitutional.

Under the #1stAmendment, Americans are supposed to have the right to criticize the government without fear of retaliation, yet last week a Kentucky appeals court case showed the extraordinary lengths local governments will go to silence critics. courier-journal.com/story/opinion/…

.Institute for Justice's First Amendment retaliation case, Gonzalez v. Trevino, is now fully briefed and ready for argument before #SCOTUS on 3/20/24. The case will decide whether (or not) petty tyrants across the U.S. can use pretextual arrests to punish their critics. supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi…

55 years ago today, our clients Mary Beth and John made history in Tinker v. Des Moines. They were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. This case made it clear: The First Amendment protects public school students. But the fight isn't over.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.