A goal I have with Mynth is to facilitate this trustlessly. Mynth intents act as an escrow. We're focusing on cross-chain swaps right now, but Mynth isn't limited to just blockchains. It can support crypto to fiat transactions too

Maybe one day The DApp ₳nalyst will unblock me when he realizes we've built solutions to a lot of the problems he complains about

For ADA <> USDC swaps we'll be launching if our Project Catalyst proposals are successful For USDC <> USDT swaps, they're already live and video marketing will begin soon

While it's a bug to be charged almost a whole ADA for ADA-only tx, even 0.17 is high. For a CNT, it's around 1.2 ADA considering min UTXO Sad that people are fighting in the comments trying to invalidate a legitimate user experience. Issues must be acknowledged and fixed

What amuses me is these AI companies are always looking to hire humans while simultaneously promising to replace humans

A LLM can never learn. It simulates learning by adding new context. A LLM model is fixed upon creation and cannot be modified dynamically. That's why new models continue to be launched. You can't launch a LLM model and have it automatically evolve

A good illustration of how LLMs work, and the difference between a regular LLM and a "reasoning" LLM LLMs don't know answers. They guess. Then they keep working to "reason" afterwards A "reasoning" model does a loop to hide the first responses and give you the final answer

Not your keys, not your coins When it comes to bridges: not your chain, not your token Traditional bridges hand you an IOU instead of the real asset. Mynth gets you the actual native tokens on your chosen chain. So you always hold the real thing, end to end.

I anticipate this same type of growth when we have multiple cross-chain pools for MNT. Arbitrage opportunities will drive volume

Can fix it by adding more interoperability to bring higher liquidity Vote on Mynth's Catalyst proposals 😎

A problem with a lot of these conversations is we're redefining words to match the technology In the end, it doesn't really matter whether a LLM can "reason" per a specific definition. What matters is if a LLM can do a task we want it to do

If you want to see this in action, one of our Project Catalyst proposals is to bring users from non-Cardano blockchains into Strike

Price goes up = organic 💪 Price goes down = manipulation 😱 People never change. Markets are always volatile. Yet there are still conspiracies like this

Many problems within crypto is simply because people don't talk to each other properly. Well, moreso the issue is lack of listening I've experienced this many times already trying to develop relationships with various entities. Listening is a rare trait. This leads to conflict