PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile
PRISMA-S

@prismasearch

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews

ID: 1365080413660729349

calendar_today25-02-2021 23:25:22

86 Tweet

979 Takipçi

0 Takip Edilen

PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thanks to Carrie Price for finding this nice example of reporting PRISMA-S Items 1 (databases), 8 (full search strategies), 9 (limits), 13 (date of search), and 15 (total records)--and thanks to the authors for their emphasis on clear reporting: bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…

EQUATOR Network (@equatornetwork) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Calling all patients, carers, healthcare professionals, and researchers working on or using #clinicaltrials: Help shape the next update of the CONSORT and SPIRIT reporting guidelines! Sign up here to have your say on what should be included: ndorms.ox.ac.uk/octru/methodol…

Calling all patients, carers, healthcare professionals, and researchers working on or using #clinicaltrials: Help shape the next update of the CONSORT and SPIRIT reporting guidelines! 

Sign up here to have your say on what should be included: ndorms.ox.ac.uk/octru/methodol…
PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In PRISMA-S, we recommend putting all search strategies in repositories, whether an institutional repository, a generalist repository like Zenodo, or a specialist repository like searchRxiv. Journal supplementary materials are not only inaccessible, but they often go missing

PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now you know to put your searches into repositories, what details should be included? All PRISMA-S items should go in the supplementary materials, plus additional reporting in the abstract and/or manuscript body for most items …maticreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11… h/t Miss Chiff

Peter Johnson (@libraryvines) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Carrie Price うーまく12歳 Carrie’s correct. Per Rethlefsen doi.org/10.1186/s13643… “Include the search strategies for each database and information source, copied and pasted exactly as run.” Makes sense too, as you want others to be able to replicate the entire review, including all searches.

Sarah V, MLIS 🇨🇦 (@svisin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hey folks, I created another template: How to write search methods for #SystematicReviews (feat. PRISMA-S by Melissa Rethlefsen et al) sarahvisintini.ca/blog-posts/wri… #MedLibs #CanMedLibs #AcademicTwitter #sysrev

Library and Knowledge Services NHS Tayside (@lkstayside) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If you are working on a systematic review, you may find the PRISMA-S checklist useful, it is an 'extension' to PRISMA-2020 aimed to ensure your output matches expectations from readers and editors, find it here! …maticreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…

Carrie Price (@carrieprice78) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Calling all journal #editors & peer #reviewers!! Did you know there's a reporting guideline for #searches? It's called PRISMA-S and it came out around 2021. It details the #transparent way in which #SystematicReview methods should be reported. osf.io/y765x

PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Are you using PRISMA-S to help guide your search strategy reporting? Spread the word about PRISMA-S by citing it! doi.org/10.1186/s13643…

PRISMA-S (@prismasearch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Did you know that Web of Science and Web of Science Core Collection are not databases? They are platforms! Access differs based on your institution's subscriptions. Be sure to check which databases you are searching, and report the names of the databases AND the platform.

Did you know that Web of Science and Web of Science Core Collection are not databases? They are platforms! Access differs based on your institution's subscriptions. Be sure to check which databases you are searching, and report the names of the databases AND the platform.