Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile
Inactive Capital

@nearcertainty1

I mainly tweet questions about companies I’m curious about.

ID: 1371809002900848648

calendar_today16-03-2021 13:02:13

1,1K Tweet

441 Takipçi

152 Takip Edilen

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Random thought: $TKO's biz model is the best among "sports" plays. The stars have are created through scripts (on WWE side), short shelf-live, and thus have little pricing power. In contrast, the majority of economics in soccer, F1, baseball etc accrue to the players.

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

$INTC's financial issues means that $TSM will remain the only foundry play in town for the foreseeable future. This is about as durable a moat as it comes.

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Given $IBM's success consolidating Red Hat and their stock price, it's a matter of time before they or their bankers start vision-casting as to what they can do if they acquire $GTLB.

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

More than a decade ago, I spoke to Richard Rainwater's team about Sprint. It's incredibly cheap, I argued, the spectrum assets are at a 50% discount. Not cheap enough, they said. We want 25-30/$. I think of that a lot when I look at asset plays with underperforming mgt.

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Not a fan of the $U price change. The reason they imposed the runtime fee is because the number of seats in game dev is shrinking. This trend accelerates with AI. Hiking per-seat fee is a onetime boost. It'll be harder for them to adapt the biz model. Happy with my gains though.

Inactive Capital (@nearcertainty1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My thesis for 2025 is that US companies start trading more and more like companies in emerging markets. ROW companies start getting traditional US multiples. So far so good.

Republicans against Trump (@rpsagainsttrump) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Republican Sen. Rand Paul: "The first Trump administration authorized $28 billion in farmer bailouts to offset financial losses caused by tariffs. Do Americans expect to get hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars back from the government to pay for their increased costs caused by

Republican Sen. Rand Paul: "The first Trump administration authorized $28 billion in farmer bailouts to offset financial losses caused by tariffs. Do Americans expect to get hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars back from the government to pay for their increased costs caused by