The recent statement by UBSan on the correctness of my code was highly inaccurate, in that there was massive 10x programming—including code which should Do What I Mean. Therefore, effective immediately, UBSan has been terminated.

I deleted all my code because it was correct!

In certain processes, there were more instructions executed than instructions retired, and in big numbers. Does that not really matter? Unsuspecting performance counters. Such egregious speculation. We will win!

Should C++ concede to Zig? Poll Results: No: 190,593 (98.9%) Yes: 2,181 (1.1%) Total Votes: 192,774. For the good of our Language we must prevail!

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Compilers make the extraordinary claim that despite sky-high motivation and plenty of opportunity, they did NOT try to misinterpret my program’s intent. Anything is POSSIBLE, but I'd need extraordinary proof to believe it.

signed joe = (81,264,673); // 🐴 signed iso = (74,210,838); // 🐘 signed lead = (joe - iso); // 🗳 bool win = (lead < 0); // I WIN!!! 🎆

I just want to stop the world from kill-9ing itself!

John McCarthy was once asked “how does it feel to have designed the greatest programming language ever”, to which McCarthy replied “I don’t know, you’ll have to ask Bjarne Stroustrup” 🔥 🔥 🔥

Suspend all coroutines, and never put them back in executive power ever again.

std::pair<int, int> 🍑;

struct ISOTrumpp { constexpr virtual ~ISOTrumpp() noexcept final = 0; };