🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Judgment Need Issue From Human Lips, a new essay by me. Based on my experience witnessing courtroom activity, and reading philosophy. My conclusion: AI can help surface evidence and legal argument, but cannot decide in our stead. open.substack.com/pub/deepsub/p/…

I sat in on the Daniel Penny trial, and saw our adversarial model of justice at work. LinkedIn post: The Daniel Penny Trial: What I Learnt Sitting In linkedin.com/pulse/daniel-p…

Earlier today after a chat I was looking for books on what the founding fathers would have thought about today's America. I didn't find a great match but it occurred to me that it could be an interesting test of the o1-pro sub I'm paying $200/mo for. So: Founding fathers on

My full essay on competition and adversarial, as seen at the Daniel Penny trial, and nature, and the human world in general. open.substack.com/pub/deepsub/p/…

Putting ChatGPT on the Stand as an Expert Witness, by Deepak Subburam open.substack.com/pub/deepsub/p/… My essay on how the use of AI in legal proceedings might be the herald of AGI.

When working with LLMs I am used to starting "New Conversation" for each request. But there is also the polar opposite approach of keeping one giant conversation going forever. The standard approach can still choose to use a Memory tool to write things down in between