When I came across this trend in my research I had to double check. Triple check. The causes are many: Some men are getting left behind. Others are disabled or addicted. A few leave voluntarily. By and large, this is a secular trend. Automation is a strong contributing

The problem is that many people never make it work in the first place. Though I suppose that's the point.

I think that the UK should be celebrating foreign investment, considering the current state of civil and economic affairs. But if this attitude is common, that explains a few things.

This is a MAJOR step change in the future if autonomous AI. It's difficult to overstate how much this will have ripple effects for decades to come.

If your wealth is tied up in stocks, then "the economy" you care about is the stock market If your wealth is primarily tied up in your labor, then "the economy" you care about is the labor market These two markets often have antagonistic interests.

AI haters often say it's a nothing burger but when you have to throttle your users because you don't have enough supply that generally is a good thing for a company. It's odd how many people gloss over this fact.

Xi from the top rope with the reverse uno card!

Hypochondriacs in despair

A while ago I said that I could foresee a future in which is would be illegal for a human to drive on many roads. If we got to a point where machine drivers are that much safer than humans, it would be unethical to endanger people. With that being said, I suspect the market

The reason it comes off as "subtle" is because it was rhetorically refined on forums for the last 10 decades. The "test" and "experimentation" was "does this blob of words convince ordinary internet denizens?" That was the loss function. It had nothing to do with actual AI,

I randomly got charged $25 by anthropic. I thought I canceled my subscription months ago. I went to investigate It was the API platform. My $25 of credits from a year ago expired (which I hadn't used) and auto-refill was enabled. So now auto-refill is disabled.

I used nano banana to add... well something close to modern nations back to the map.

One of the least credible aspects of the Star Trek world is that they acknowledge, in universe, that automation could do all their jobs, but they insist on doing shoddy, slapdash, human-centric jobs (and don't even really rely on machines for help) on principle.

Gentle reminder: AI is only going to improve from here.

TL;DR The paper introduces “K-Dense,” a guided, multi-agent AI workflow that helped the authors build a transcriptomic “aging clock” that reports not only a biological-age estimate but also a calibrated confidence interval. Using 57,584 RNA-seq samples from 28 tissues (ARCHS4),

OpenAI is having an interesting day. I would anticipate an AI Explained video any minute now... Between this and their ICPC announcement, it should be interesting.

Okay, here's the simple metaphor for how OpenAI cut "scheming" rates from 13% to 0.3% in some models: You know how in math class you'd get graded as much (or more) on the METHOD you used? SHOW YOUR WORK. They want to see you following their first principles, their reasoning,

get wrecked

I am once again reminding you that you are not excited enough about this graph. It looks like a simple exponential, right? But it's on a logarithmic graph...