1 August 2024; 1 year ago today. The world watched as a man viciously beat a woman under the guise of "sport". The Angela Carini vs Imane Khelif fight lasted only 46 seconds, but it tarnished the Olympics forever. 🧵

The upshot of this case appears to be very simple and rather obvious now... If you are excluded from sports, or some protected space, because of your sex, you cannot bring a case claiming you have been discriminated against on the basis of your "gender reassignment".

“Why did all of these senior people fall over themselves to take Upton’s side, even at the expense of truth? Because trans identity tops an all-important oppression hierarchy and the purest form of virtue is being a ‘trans ally’.” thetimes.com/article/6f3e20…

Pride in Surrey warning folx to stay safe.

Wow! This gives a new reflection on the last minute, anonymous whistle blower witness from in the hospital mail room. The hospital couldn’t risk not passing on all Sandie’s post after that testimony. Wonder if this witness was moved by all the support for Sandie?

BREAKING: Jennifer Melle, suspended for whistleblowing how she was disciplined for indirectly ‘misgendering’ a transgender paedophile patient, has accused the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) of abandoning her during the most traumatic period of her life. Jennifer was racially

Alternatively: Dr Upton is a 6' tall, heterosexual, ex-rugby-playing married man whose choice to invade a women only changing room has garnered him media attention.

Here, showing off the latest in Australian female style is the lovely Roxy! Please marvel at the haircut! The top! The feeling! (Man jaw, adam's apple and creep factor, models own.)

More than 72 hours have passed since this attack and the BBC has yet to report it, despite previously reporting attacks on the offices of MPs Peter Bone, Julia Buckley, Jo Stevens and Rehman Chishti. Why? The BBC does not want to highlight when it’s trans activists doing the

Good article by Michael Foran explaining the legal arguments in Sandie Peggie v NHS Fife/Upton case

“The case, brought by nurse Sandie Peggie against NHS Fife and Dr Beth Upton,” writes Michael Foran “Brings into sharp focus the stakes of the ongoing debate about the relationship between sex and gender identity within our law” thecritic.co.uk/sandie-peggie-…

An excellent summary by Michael Foran. The Peggie V NHS Fife & Upton case reveals extraordinary incompetence by both NHS Fife and some parts of the legal profession. Breathtaking!

Jonnyboybrum Reform UK Nigel Farage MP Yes, yes they do. Well done. This is because: - a trans person still has a sex - discrimination can be based on perception. So, a trans-id woman who claims to be a man could sue for discrimination if, for example, she wasn't hired because she might get pregnant. Even though she

I do love it when they mansplain OUR ruling...

Ken Zucker I agree it absolutely makes no sense. But this is what happens when you set up a system where a child can self identify, where you can get a letter of support from a therapist after a single visit, where the letter of support is pre-drafted and fill in the blank. Where the

New episode! How did we end up with a case like #SandiePeggie? Because standards have collapsed inside HR's industry body. At their recent conference, a senior CIPD staffer: - Said 'trans inclusion rights [are] potentially being eroded' (!) - Claimed the 'Equalities Act' would

Thread: Why Noel Hutley’s Arguments in Giggle for Girls Matter – An Observer’s Take #IloveNoelHutley I feel stroppy about some of the criticisms on X around Noel Hutley - Giggle's Counsel's performance yesterday - here's some keep points to make for those not listening: 1️⃣

1/ Day 2 of Giggle v Tickle in the Federal Court laid bare the battle lines. On one side, sex-based rights and legal clarity. On the other, an ideology that demands submission to things we cannot know, cannot say, and do not believe. 🧵1/15

14/ She dismissed sex-based measures as outdated. She claimed that any exclusion, whether intentional or not, should be considered unlawful. She treated women’s boundaries as hostile and their rights as conditional.

It is a direct implication of TWAW that this is completely unobjectionable. As is male rapists in women’s prisons. If they want any credibility at all, TRAs need to (i) show how this isn’t implied, (ii) abandon TWAW or (iii) start defending this insane shit explicitly