If science has yet 2 clearly explain the phenomenon of consciousness, can we consciously use science 2 confirm that a god doesn't exist? We can however, scientifically deduce that a 'god' wouldn't be as petty as its creation. Its wrong to limit god with our imperfect perception.

Standing between atheists & theists, I've realized both may be wrong. Theists have not known an Ultimate Perfect Power (w/the 3 O's) and atheists have not accepted that consciousness (like all energy) will transform after death. But 'God' Doesn't Care... amazon.com/GOD-DOESNT-CAR…

Imagine an absent deadbeat dad showing up to your 18th bday, demanding respect and love or you’d be grounded for life. Your response would be similar to the decline in Christianity. #freeChrist #ultimateperfectpower #goddoesntcareasmuchasyoudo

Written to show how manmade doctrines and scientific limitations have caused the unending rift between atheists & theists (neither side able to win because neither side is completely correct). Topics include Despair, What is a 'god'?, Pantheism, Identity, The Real Reality, Time,

Man-made doctrines: created by humans to make other humans care and formulated as if god cares #goddoesntcareasmuchasyoudo #UltimatePerfectPower

A modern take on Spinozas god, inspired by Einstein’s theories.

Swinging at each other in the dark.

@YoungAthiest0 @PaulinSC1 The #UltimatePerfectPower (my modern take on Spinozas god), does not care to meddle in the affairs of this tiny insignificant planet. #GodDoesntCareAsMuchAsYouDo

Page 21 – ‘Ultimate because there is nothing beyond, besides, above or aside from it. It is all there is. Again, if there is anything outside of it then the question is asked, where did that thing come from, does it precede it? Is that external thing part of something greater

Page 18 – ‘Do we require worship from the billions of cells within our body? Do we cry or get angry at the billions of times our cells have died and been replaced? Would it not be simple vanity to prefer one body part and discard the rest? It is not heartless when thought of that

Why did Albert Einstein believe in the possibility of a god and Stephen Hawking did not; even though they were both geniuses? First, Albert Einstein believed in a ‘Spinozan god’ (very similar to the Ultimate Perfect Power introduced on page 21). This is a more pantheistic view

John 16:25 ‘Now I speak in parables (the proof that the OT god is not the Father Christ speaks of, is in the Parables). But the time comes when I will speak plainly of the father’. That time is now. Those words are here. And to prove the totality of the ‘Father’ (the Ultimate

Humans really need to get over ourselves 😀

Some atheists love science but avoid parts with implications that threaten their disbelief

The inevitable decline of Atheism, as it joins Theism in the irrational bucket. finance.yahoo.com/news/one-2024s…

Happy BLIND FRIDAY!

Eclipses happen about 2 to 3 times a year throughout the Universe. Only on this tiny planet would some of its self centered inhabitants make a religious thing out of it smh.

The hurts sometimes...

For the Atheists who think an Ultimate Perfect Power should make existence perfect for humans

There are many things that are real that we don't have evidence for, like Dark Matter/Energy. Or on a personal level we don't have evidence of our ancestors from 5,000 yrs old, but we know they must have existed in order for us to be here.