🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

New JEDI Lab paper led by padawan Hulda Karlsson-Larsson examining moderators for overhead aversion in charitable giving sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

New paper with Ike Silver and Deborah Small just out at Psychological Science: People often compare bad acts to other bad acts. Is it worse to kill two people than to kill one? Should someone who assaulted an adult be punished less than someone who did the same to a child?

New preprint. We tackle the most common criticisms of NHST and show how to address them. With NHST 🤯

New replication & extension paper out in RSOS via PCI Registered Reports (@[email protected]) - led by Zöe June Horsham and orchestrated by Gilad Feldman. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…

How to improve conceptual clarity in psychology? Excited to share a new preprint with Rui Mata, discussing approaches based on large language models as possible solutions. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/psya…

Do people still use online platforms like Prolific for social science research? How do you get data from them that's usable (i.e. not generated by ChatGPT)? Please share tips!

1/ In our recent paper with ☠️ Duygu Uygun-Tunc ☠ (philsci-archive.pitt.edu/25196/), we defend the use of conventional alpha levels (e.g., 0.05, 0.01, or 5 sigma) in scientific inference. We challenge the claim that these thresholds should be set in a value-laden or context-dependent way. 🧵👇

Periodic reminder that economists would sacrifice half a thumb for an AER pub

Can analysis blinding help prevent post-publication "fruitless discussions and tension" between original authors and #replication teams, while still preserving healthy debate? New perspective/opinion from Alexandra Sarafoglou and Suzanne Hoogeveen doi.org/10.1525/collab…

Honestly, I think our new paper has serious implications for experimental econ 22–27% failed comprehension in the Dictator and Ultimatum games In the Trust Game and Public Goods Game, that number hit 70% and 52% These are foundational tools of exp econ doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo… 🧵

6/6 This paper was really hard to place in journals focused on experimental econ. That could mean: 1️ It’s a bad study. 2️ Or... it’s a tough pill to swallow. Full paper 👉 doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo… OSF 👉 osf.io/jeycb/

Important new paper for charitable giving: the preference for charities with lower overhead ratios (i.e., "overhead aversion") can be reduced when both: a) explaining the importance of overhead and b) prompting the donor to deliberate about their choice

Lots of famous findings about human behavior are built on the results of economic games - tasks where participants allocate resources or make choices with different payoffs. A new study finds that up to 70% of participants don't understand the instructions of these games.

“99% of Gamblers Lose in the Long Run”: An Experimental Comparison of Novel and Pre-Existing Harm Prevention (Safer Gambling) Messages Warning About the Likelihood of Losing Money. From Philip Newall, Leon Xiao et al. doi.org/10.1525/collab…

67% of the emissions driving climate change is attributable to the top 10% of the global income distribution - 20% is due to the top 1%. New paper in Nature Climate Change

1/ 🌟Paper *just* accepted @ PSPB!🌟 Does moral licensing really exist?? 👀(doing a good thing, then a less good thing) ➡️ Many failed replications. Why? ➡️ Using #metaanalysis, we put the effect to the test—to uncover when & why it happens 🧵👇 @NorthumbriaPsych #SocialPsych

The academic impact of open science: systematic review findings presented by Dr Thomas Klebel Thomas Klebel youtu.be/0jPSWqYKQEM The event was organised by ReproducibiliTea UEA

🚨FORRT Hackathon: Contribute to the Accessible Feedback in Academia E-Book! 🚨 📅 Thursday, 29 May 🕚 11:00–13:00 BST | 12:00–14:00 CEST | 10:00–12:00 UTC 🔗 Join via MS Teams: teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/… #OpenScience #Hackathon 🧵