Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile
Giovanni Barillari

@gi0baro

Physicist, software developer, SRE. Photography passionated. In love with radical honesty.

ID: 139692014

linkhttp://github.com/gi0baro calendar_today03-05-2010 11:38:43

2,2K Tweet

336 Takipçi

318 Takip Edilen

Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A lot of tweets during the AWS incident were absolutely bad. But Theo's "reaction" video is not better. That's why I wrote a post about it. blog.baro.dev/p/on-the-aws-d…

Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile Photo

From my own frameworks docs (emmett.sh/docs/2.7.x/for…), written almost 10 years ago: "I like magic too, but isn't it cooler when you actually control the magic?"

Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wanna do smth actually good? Use your "influence" to push Google and Twitch to donate 0.1% revenue to OSS they use. You'll see how quicker the encoding/decoding scene will improve thanks to that.

rvivek (@rvivek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I created the opensource library that all of your developers use and you still want me to reverse a linked list in the interview?

I created the opensource library that all of your developers use and you still want me to reverse a linked list in the interview?
Armin Ronacher ⇌ (@mitsuhiko) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Listened to a youtube dev influencer shit on Python developers and Anthropic simultaneously on a MCP video. Man isn't the world easy if you are just critiquing instead of having to figure shit out in the weeds.

Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The moment ppl forget that "diversity" and "discrimination" are antonyms, the world becomes a very bad place to live in. "Reverse discrimination" is semantically nonsense, whoever spits it is just acting moronic. Leave the PSF alone and go back learning the meaning of words.

Giovanni Barillari (@gi0baro) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Crazy how much more informed you can be by running "benchmarks" yourself other than trusting a few lines in a README, which cherry pick 4 models – not "most of them" – and lacks methodology. Calling other people wrong doesn't make you right, I guess.