Twitter Beğeni Hilesi

If you haven't yet read Ted Chiang's essay on generative AI and art, get on it. For my money, it's one of the best things written on AI, period—it gets to the heart of what's so dismaying about AI in a single haunting sentence: "It reduces the amount of intention in the world."

Reminder: the Internet Archive case only concerns the mass scanning and unauthorized distribution of books without permission from authors/owners. It isn't shutting down the Wayback Machine, or the Grateful Dead bootlegs or anything else.

Here’s one way to stand up for libraries.

BREAKING: Here's the first criminal case regarding AI and music streaming! justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/n…

Rolling Stone’s Ethan Millman has more details and analysis on the first criminal AI music streaming case rollingstone.com/music/music-ne…

This is $10 million out of musicians' pockets. We can be grateful for SDNY's work, but there's a fear this case could be the tip of the Gen-AI iceberg.

This lawsuit has been brought by music publishers, not record labels. That Chamber of Progress doesn’t know the difference tells you something about the quality of their analysis.

Good ideas from Australia!

This guy wasn't just (allegedly) scamming the platforms--he was siphoning royalties away from artists who actually earned it.

The indictment details activity by unnamed co-conspirators, including an AI company CEO.

We have a simple policy suggestion here: require that dynamic pricing only be allowed with explicit permission of the artist.

Did you know that a company called Liberty Media simultaneously owns 83% of satellite radio monopolist SiriusXM as well as 35% of Live Nation? When so few companies have so much power, artists face real fears of retaliation if they speak out.