FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty (@fusionaier) 's Twitter Profile
FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty

@fusionaier

A journal inspired by the belief that Western civilization is defined by intertwined threads of freedom and tradition, innovation and order, rights and duties.

ID: 1623778294058438657

linkhttps://www.fusionaier.org/ calendar_today09-02-2023 20:18:30

501 Tweet

589 Followers

121 Following

Dr Daniel Pitt (@danjtpitt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"Buckley, the founder of National Review and leader of the modern conservative movement, was clear in his rejection of the Millian understanding of speech and academic freedom." Dr. Nicholas Mosvick via FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty fusionaier.org/post/academic-


David Lambert (@dalambertusa) 's Twitter Profile Photo

“The conscious conservatism that we need is different: not an ideology per se but a perspective that recognizes the world as it is, which seeks to bring about change in practice and not just in theory,” writes Avi Woolf, Wilderness ConservativeđŸș for FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty. buff.ly/Xk6AmNk

FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty (@fusionaier) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Courts struck down Trump's tariffs under IEEPA, but the administration was already preparing alternative emergency powers to achieve the same goals. This raises important questions about executive power. Dave Hebert breaks it down at Fusion: fusionaier.org/post/tariffs-t


Dominic Pino (@dominicjpino) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Check out my piece for FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty about the Court of International Trade's boring, conservative opinion against Trump's IEEPA tariffs. The decision was an example of judicial restraint, not activism. fusionaier.org/post/the-us-co


FUSION: In the Tradition of Liberty (@fusionaier) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Was the court ruling against Trump's tariffs just partisan bias? Dominic Pino explains why the unanimous decision—from judges including two Republican appointees—was actually textbook judicial restraint, not activism. Emergency powers don't give presidents unlimited tariff

Was the court ruling against Trump's tariffs just partisan bias? <a href="/DominicJPino/">Dominic Pino</a> explains why the unanimous decision—from judges including two Republican appointees—was actually textbook judicial restraint, not activism.

Emergency powers don't give presidents unlimited tariff