Let's see who is actually following me. Thoughts on OBBB 90% provision wrt to gambling: It's not good obviously but there will be ways to mitigate for pro gambler. What will be key is definition of "session" as defined in Park v Comm and Schollenberger v Comm.

Bet Bash 2026 is gonna be so much fun at Woodbine Casino.

Republicans hurt Las Vegas gamblers and the gaming industry with their BS budget. I am working on a bill now that would reverse this unfair anti-gaming tax provision.

Depending on how a “session” gets defined (if ever), it might actually mean arbing/middling is the only sustainable method of pro betting — short of past-posting/fixing. God help us all.

'Inspect element' fraud touts are the nut low. +285/+285 = +1382 on the display, but the actual FD payout is +1382.25. Shockingly, ALL IN ABE🃏 here didn't actually bet $750, and therefore didn't win $11115 ($11116.88 would've been the actual winnings). Cool Whop Sports logo.

Rough night for Mr. Met at the Lumineers concert

THERE IT IS FOLKS THE WORST BET I’VE PLACED ALL YEAR ROCKIES ML

i.e. marketing & legal advised us 22yo morons running a gray area sweepsbook that goading someone in writing to go on a public smear campaign was ill-advised

I DO A CHART EVERY YEAR FOR WHAT THE NEW DILDO COLORS ARE AT LOVERS LANE. AND I HIGHLIGHT ALL THE FIRST YEAR ONES WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE COLOR (E.G. LIME GREEN WAS 2025'S DOTY). THE WHOLE FRICKIN CHART LIKE IS COLORS. THERE ARE VERY FEW DILDOS WITH THE SAME GUY MOLD AS LAST YEAR.

One third of the women attending bet bash disagree Ferris

when your counterparty is SIG there’s no such thing as angle shooting

Everyone freaking out about nothing. DK can say whatever they want in their T&Cs but they can’t just ignore state regs, and states heavily specify criteria for voids. For eg, in IL, DK’s RB2 example fits 0 of the listed criteria needed to void: