☀️June Issue ☀️ Carsten Anckar (Åbo Akademi University) & Thomas Denk (Örebro universitet) introduce a dataset that covers over 200 independent countries from 1800–2022, providing the most comprehensive overview of the of death penalty to date. 👉 bit.ly/4jOjuUf

☀️June Issue ☀️ Valentina Ausserladscheider, Jennifer Bair, Vivien Schmidt & @GerhardSchnyder review of ‘Business & Populism: The Odd Couple?’ by Glenn Morgan & M Feldmann, concluding with a response to reviewers written by the authors themselves. Oxford University Press 👉 bit.ly/3FCjzwl

☀️June Issue ☀️ 💬 '..a cerebral, extensive and optimistic analysis...’ 📖 Guy Gerba reviews 'Democracy's Resilience to Populism's Threat' by Kurt Weyland (Cambridge University Press - Politics, 2024) 👉 bit.ly/4jNByhm

☀️June Issue ☀️ 💬'...this book will have a lasting impact...’ 📖 Claudia Badulescu reviews ‘Crises of European integration: Joining together or falling apart?' by @LucasSchramm91 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) 👉 bit.ly/4dDiIGS

That's everything from our ☀️June Issue ☀️ Volume 24 Issue 2 📗🔍#Research articles, 📚#Symposium -🌐, 📊#dataset, 💼#Profession, & 📖#BookReviews 🔓 Over 50% #OA ✒️17 contributors 🕵️ & many more anonymous referees 👉 bit.ly/4jOz2Y2

We hope you've enjoyed the ☀️June Issue ☀️ 👏 Thanks to all our brilliant EPS contributors & to the anonymous reviewers 🕵️ who help to make each manuscript the best it can be 🔔 Sign up for content alerts for 🆕 articles in your area of #PolSci 👉 bit.ly/3VNECRC

‼️The EPS submission site will be closed for new submissions from 1 July 2025 ‼️ ✅ It will reopen with Cambridge University Press on 1 August 2025. ✅ 📝 You may continue to submit reviews & revised papers. 🤔 Questions? please email [email protected]

‼️The EPS submission site is now closed for new submissions ‼️ ✅ It will reopen with Cambridge University Press on 1 August 2025. ✅ 📝 You may continue to submit reviews & revised papers. 🤔 Questions? please email [email protected]

🆕 📚#SpecialIssue "Dissensus over liberal democracy in Europe" coordinated by Ramona Coman & Nathalie Brack explores how dissensus shapes policies & democratic institutions, and how liberal democracy is being transformed across Europe. 👉 bit.ly/4ldQhUn

🆕 📚Nathalie Brack & Ramona Coman introduce the SI on rising dissensus over liberal democracy in the EU, highlighting conflicts among actors on democratic principles and the impact on EU policies amid the rise of radical and populist parties. 👉 bit.ly/4eHYRIw 🔓

🆕 📚Ramona Coman & Nathalie Brack attempt to understand the lack of consensus over liberal democracy and propose an empirical definition of dissensus supported by a typology of ideal types. 👉 bit.ly/4nsMlAp 🔓

🆕 📚 Martin Deleixhe critically discusses the concept of peoplehood and its link to democratic expectations, highlighting how the EU's support issues stem from an absence of a European people. 👉bit.ly/4nxsosj

🆕 📚 The Constitution's destruction reflects extra-systemic dissensus directed against political order, state Wojciech Włoch & Maciej Serowaniec. They argue that the political changes in Poland signify deconstruction rather than a new constitutionalism. 👉bit.ly/3Iazva1 🔓

🆕 📚 MartaMatrakova outlines 4 strategies to limit dissensus on liberal democracy in hybrid regimes during legislative drafting, adapting to the goals of actors in Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova. 👉 bit.ly/44eAZsl

🆕 📚 Zsolt Enyedi & Benjamin Stanley investigate Jarosław Kaczyński and Viktor Orbán's political projects, to explore how Western conservative radicalisation fueled their illiberal turn in the 2010s. 👉 bit.ly/3TVnCXT 🔓

The 2024 Impact Factors are here! Take a look at how our journals measured up 📚👇 🔵 EJPR journal IF 4.2, 22nd in #polsci 🔴 EJIR (European Journal of International Relations) IF 2.9, 15th in #IR 🟣 European Political Science Review IF 2.5, 69th in #polsci 🟠 PRXJournal IF 2.1, 153rd in #Polsci 🟢 European Political Science Journal IF 1.9, 103rd in #polsci

🆕 📚 Ramona Coman, Emilien Paulis, Leonardo Puleo & Noemi Trino investigate how think tanks in Poland and Hungary connect national, European, and American intellectuals and actors, fostering dissensus over liberal democracy in CEE and beyond. 👉 bit.ly/44r7Mcw 🔓

🆕 📚Examining the criminalisation of climate protests in France, Germany, Switzerland, and the UK, Christina Eckes reflects on the role of judges who deprive the disobedient from the opportunity to communicate their motives. 👉 bit.ly/3ZYboS0

🆕 📚 Andrea Capati & Thomas Christiansen 🇪🇺🇺🇦 examine the links between legitimacy, politicisation and the rise of political dissensus in the context of the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). 👉 bit.ly/3Gwm8Al 🔓

🆕 📚 Sergiu Gherghina, Bettina Mitru & Sergiu Mişcoiu offer a new perspective on EU exit as a form of disruptive dissensus by examining how it is shaped by people’s attitudes towards the Union’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 👉 bit.ly/3IrENhc 🔓