“AI artist” ohh you mean fucking loser

I saw this and had to share it.

So you told an AI program to draw… and you want to take credit for it? Who are you; Pythagoras? 🙄

The future? It looks like the cast of Cocoon.

"We welcome migrants, we don't scapegoat them. Low wages, poor housing, poor public services, are not the fault of migrants... we have to make the case for the benefits of migration" The most duplicitous politician in my lifetime

Keir Starmer every time he opens his mouth

We wish you nothing but failure. Every single piece of AI “data” you’ll be using was stolen from 100 years of real filmmakers’ work. Also, your website is childish and unsophisticated. With all that money, it was a surprise. Then again, as a friend put it, “It’s because they have

Because Scotland is just as full of eejits as the rest of the UK bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Paul Laverty's post-release statement shows his legal training and deep humanity. He must have run rings around them in the police station. Not a hint of terrorism, violent intent or antisemitism on display here. Surely the charge cannot stand.

Don't use AI if you care at all about kids. Seriously.

Fair play to this guy. He's absolutely spot. This is the Britain I love and know.

For a moment, I thought this was the Onion.

retweet if you actually just fucking hate AI

We can not and should not accept this.

Re-nationalise water and utilities. RT if you agree.

Let me save you the trouble: Here are all of the recurring arguments in favor of generative AI… all of them bad: “It’s here and it’s not going anywhere!” - I’m not against the existence of the technology. I’m opposed to its reckless and unethical abuse. “You’re old so you

Have you ever watched a video of someone painting? It’s so wonderful to watch the painting slowly take shape. It fills you with awe. No one will ever feel that way watching you type a prompt into a box. It doesn’t matter how many times you lie and call yourself an “artist”

Don’t use Glasgow’s children to spread Reform’s poison.

The artist AI argument is so simple. The sequence is straightforward. Two premises, one conclusion: 1. Artists didn't consent to have their art used in AI training 2. AI was trained on their work anyway 3. Therefore it's a theft of their intellectual AND material property,