SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile
SeaScience Film Labs

@seasciencefilml

Comparative Science Demonstrations; YouTube Content Creator

ID: 1684079900418883584

linkhttps://youtube.com/@SeaScienceFilmLabs?si=J5YmARiSl61s1c0Q calendar_today26-07-2023 05:55:58

522 Tweet

21 Followers

64 Following

Bad Leroy Brown (@leroyb756) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Fun fact, the fossil record, the actual physical evidence, almost never matches the secular fable they call phylogenetic trees.

SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

How the Scientific Community Hinders Scientific Thought | feat. Ocean Chemist Dr. Edward Peltzer and Synthetic Organic Chemist Dr. James Tour youtu.be/8hZQl2vlzlA #MildlyInteresting #Science #Philosophy

SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

B the Mystic Stitches777☠️ Not Evolution Yes, Mankind is One Species; It's Nice that Biologists recognizes this, Now: But, do Not forget the historical "Scientific Racism" that arose from Darwin's books; the caging of Humankind, displaying them as Science attractions: youtu.be/nY6Zrol5QEk American Museum of Natural History The Leakey Foundation

Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SeaScience Film Labs Dan Cameron ✝️ Joyfillednomads Not Evolution The Yoo et al. (2025) Nature paper provides complete ape genomes, revealing higher divergence (12.5–27.3% unalignable regions) due to resolved repetitive areas like centromeres. This refines prior estimates but affirms human-chimp split at 5.5–6.3 Ma and phylogenetic patterns. It

Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SeaScience Film Labs Humans and chimpanzees share ~98% similarity in alignable DNA sequences, but whole-genome comparisons—including indels, structural variants, and non-aligning regions—yield ~84-85% per recent telomere-to-telomere assemblies (e.g., 2023-2025 studies). The "98%+" figure is

SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok "52?!?" How did You count "52?" "Lucy" A.L. 288~1 only had 47 fossils attributed to it when discovered by Johanson in 74' and the discovery of the Baboon Vertebra Makes it "46" and Not "52" as Your source claimed... Now, Isn't that right?

Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SeaScience Film Labs American Museum of Natural History Multiple specimens contribute to reconstructions of Tiktaalik and Ichthyostega, as is common in paleontology for incomplete fossils—e.g., Tiktaalik's holotype is one individual, with paratypes adding details like hind limbs from the same site (Shubin et al., 2006, 2014). Metrics

SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok American Museum of Natural History Hahaha! Yes! Everyone that has an Education is fed the Pakicetus to Whale narrative... Why should I believe that the Pakicetus is an ancestor to Modern Whales? 🍎

<a href="/grok/">Grok</a> <a href="/AMNH/">American Museum of Natural History</a> Hahaha! Yes! 
Everyone that has an Education is fed the Pakicetus to Whale narrative... 

Why should I believe that the Pakicetus is an ancestor to Modern Whales? 🍎
SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok American Museum of Natural History The Laetoli footprints were claimed by Mary Leakey to look like Modern Human footprints, only smaller; it was the layer they were found in, and nearby fossils that caused the belief these footprints were from some "Human Ancestor," which at the Time lacked a Name Original Lit:

<a href="/grok/">Grok</a> <a href="/AMNH/">American Museum of Natural History</a> The Laetoli footprints were claimed by Mary Leakey to look like Modern Human footprints, only smaller; it was the layer they were found in, and nearby fossils that caused the belief these footprints were from some "Human Ancestor," which at the Time lacked a Name

Original Lit:
SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok American Museum of Natural History But, What kind of creature could Make "Small Human Footprints?" Oh, yeah! People come in small sizes too, and Mary revealed they're the same size as a "Woman's size seven" on the One individual... The Leakey Foundation

<a href="/grok/">Grok</a> <a href="/AMNH/">American Museum of Natural History</a> But, What kind of creature could Make "Small Human Footprints?"

Oh, yeah! People come in small sizes too, and Mary revealed they're the same size as a "Woman's size seven" on the One individual... 

<a href="/TheLeakeyFndtn/">The Leakey Foundation</a>
SeaScience Film Labs (@seasciencefilml) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok American Museum of Natural History They were both Children, but one was Younger than the Other... I've compared the print's lengths Modern Human Shoe fitting Charts... Your Measurements are vague, and these are More specific:

<a href="/grok/">Grok</a> <a href="/AMNH/">American Museum of Natural History</a> They were both Children, but one was Younger than the Other...

I've compared the print's lengths Modern Human Shoe fitting Charts...

Your Measurements are vague, and these are More specific:
Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SeaScience Film Labs American Museum of Natural History Hypothetically, if the Laetoli prints were made by modern humans, the smaller G2/3 tracks (~15-19 cm) could match children around 4-6 years old, and larger G1 (~21-26 cm) around 8-12, based on average foot growth charts. However, 3D analyses reveal transitional traits like ~14°