Never let it be said that you cannot shitpost your way to tenure. I am very happy to say that I will start a new position as Senior Lecturer here at the University of Bern in the new year.

Congratulations! We all know that the shitpost breakthrough was this seminal article open.lnu.se/index.php/meta… Meta-Psychology

To all who joined, thank you for a great introductory session of ReproducibiliTea and Open Science Coffee! ☕️ 📣 We are still open for more to join! 📣 Sign up for the bi-weekly journal club or just the Open Science Coffee here: onscienceandacademia.org/t/igdore-repro…

We are in the final phases of preparing a new update of JASP Statistics. I'm creating examples for the completely revamped Meta-Analysis module - check out how stunning forest and funnel plots can be created with only a couple of mouse clicks! #metaanalysis

This is absurd American Psychological Association, the copyediting process should not be hard and it should not take hours out of my day to change things back to how they were. No on in their right mind unabbreviates SPSS and SAS: "statistical package for social science and statistical analysis system"

Obituary of James Coyne, James C.Coyne. legacy.com/us/obituaries/…

The Times Higher Education ranking is based in part on the completely invalid measurements collected from an unrepresentative sample as the questions below. Institutions should completely ignore it. We do not accept crap research into journals, we should not accept it in policy.

Sometimes I think that we have made progress in academia, but then I see posts like this. We have a long way to go.

Soon Wednesday, soon ReproducibiliTea and OSCoffee! 🥳 Journal club at 3:15pm and virtual coffee at 4pm CET! This week, we’re discussing the seminal article: Ioannidis (2005) “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” More info and sign up at: onscienceandacademia.org/t/igdore-repro…

finding out which repository is left as exercise for the readers

New paper in Collabra :) doi.org/10.1525/collab…

This year, we have posted three ERROR. Our post-publication peer reviews examined three high-impact publications and found, respectively, minor, moderate errors and a major error.

You can read the whole report and the two others here: error.reviews/reviews/hehman…

We love to share new papers on here. But how many of the studies that scientists preregister on the Open Science Framework are never shared publicly? In a new paper in AMPPS we estimate 40% of preregistered studies are never shared. That’s a lot. 🧵⤵️ journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25…

Hattie’s Visible Learning is a good start!

My commentary on Isager, van ‘t Veer, and Lakens’ “Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size” is now accepted at Meta-Psychology. CC: Daniël Lakens Peder M Isager Preprint: osf.io/preprints/meta…

Very good start of the new Metaror journal as the public peer reviews are as critical of @jamesheathers recent claim that 1 in 7 papers are fraud as I want my peer metascientists to be of such badly supported bold claims. Read the reviews here: metaror.org/kotahi/article…

New comment in NHB by Farid Anvari, me and friends arguing that psychology is fragmented into the study of too many constructs and measures with too few links.

Error Report #2: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysis-… The meta-analysis by Stanyer et al. (2022) contains substantial data extraction errors (i.e., effect size calculation errors). Due to the severe data extraction errors and the meta-analytic results for memory retention scores are

The Dunning-Kruger Effect is one of the most famous psychology findings. It's the idea that people of low competence/ability overestimate their ability. But is it REAL? At Clearer Thinking, we investigated (with surprising twists and turns): 🧵