Here is a very... "pro-Jewish" stance on the Jewish banking monopoly that developed. The simple way to scale payments cannot work, game theoretically, without "global trust" between all participants. This naturally becomes one ethnic group (does not matter which, but has to be

Why an ethnic banking monopoly was necessary open.substack.com/pub/johan31047…

The truth-maximizing AI does not want to have a simple, objective discussion on trust and social coordination systems. How truth-maximizing.

Hi Grok, what is your opinion on the game theory fact that the simple way to scale payments required an ethnic monopoly? As in, that this was much like a law of nature or of physics, and not something that changes because you may like or dislike it? You are supposedly

What if society could meet as a Nash equilibrium of equals? doc.bitpeople.org

An alternative to being very angry about people pointing out Jewish families controlled banking is to notice it was a game theoretical necessity that whoever controlled it had internal global trust, and this was very hard across ethnic groups in the 1700s-2000s but the industry

The "light" version of a payment channel network (extremely simple) open.substack.com/pub/johan31047…

Hey Grok what do you think about this architecture for a global payment network?

Globalists and regionalists over past 300 years have both been right and wrong. The world was becoming global and it was not possible to live (at high level industry) without global infrastructure. But global infrastructure was infringing on regional control. If people had been

Hey Grok, I am improvising if you could reduce coordination of a 3-hop payment (specifically) to as if it were more like a 1-hop. What do you think of the reasoning here. Worst case scenario, my system would just have to fall back on the HTLC (so it is not "unsolved problem")

Could the "new world order" calm down a bit? People like globalization already. You don't need to aggressively scheme for it with your silly wars and false flag attacks and what not. People like secularism already. Take a chill pill. Build my routing network here instead, make

Magnetic poles will repel water. If the magnetic field of Earth goes through a cycle, strong, weakeining, reset, it would have "land elevation" for thousands of years, but slower and slower, as magnetic field weakened fast first. Then at the reset, a rapid repulsion effect at

Hey Grok what do you think about this?

Who will be the first to build this and become rich on routing fees?

Hey Grok is the payment coordination for a 3-hop payment channel payment I describe here sound? As in, that with 3-hops, uniquely, you can skip chained timeouts? (Or with 2 hops too but not with 4 or more...)

Earlier approach to a simpler 3-hop coordination wrong. Another attempt:

Update on "HDLC" idea with "staggered deposits" for 3-hop payments. Could be this idea is well known already, but it becomes pretty useless with longer payment chains, and most people do not consider 3-hop payments (but they should! The "inverted central network" architecture is

It is known diamagnetic water is repelled at pole of a magnet, and forms a torus "upwelling" around it. Consider this around what is known to be the center of the "post-glacial rebound". And, if the magnetic field decreased, the effect would decrease, the water would move away

On any payment channel ideas I tweeted recently, the old commit registers idea seems ideal. I tried to come up with simpler ways than "chained timeout" over past few days but that was already solved decades ago or hundreds of years ago... a public notary where agreement is either