"Scientific journals have had enormous positive impact on the development of science, but in some ways, they are now hampering rather than enhancing open scientific discourse." Founding Editor-in-Chief Martin Kulldorff on the future of science publishing. publichealth.realclearjournals.org/perspectives/2…

Enhancing transparency and open scientific discourse, we are launching the Journal of the Academy of Public Health (Journal of the Academy of Public Health) with open peer review that all can read and where good scientists can publish whatever their studies conclude. Check it out! publichealth.realclearjournals.org

Proud to be an editorial board member on this new journal, the Journal of the Academy of Public Health, created to promote open and transparent discourse on science and public health. Journal of the Academy of Public Health publichealth.realclearjournals.org

Peer review is fundamental to science and reviewers should be paid. Our new open access and open peer review Journal of the Academy of Public Health (Journal of the Academy of Public Health) does that. If you agree, check it out and sign up to review! publichealth.realclearjournals.org

New paper by Jay Bhattacharya Martin Kulldorff with a thorough analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine trials. Two major problems identified: - a failure in the design, with a mismatch between the clinical trial endpoints (any COVID-19 infection) and the public health interest

Delighted to be on the Editorial Board of the new Journal of the Academy of Public Health Journal of the Academy of Public Health that stands for open scientific debate and transparent review, led by friend and colleague Martin Kulldorff

Watch the 2020 debate between JAPH editors Martin Kulldorff and Andrew Noymer 🇺🇦 on the validity of public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the model of scientific disagreement that inspires our journal's mission. reason Gene Epstein youtube.com/watch?v=s6q-2e…