ai won’t take your job. it’ll be the intern with gpt-4, a subscription, and zero shame, working twice as fast for half the pay — the real threat isn’t ai. it’s people willing to use it while you’re still updating your resume

people keep asking what AI job should i pick to not get replaced?—newsflash: if it can be done with a prompt, it will be done by a teen for $5 — learn to think with machines, not just click around them

ai just schooled 70,000 recruiters at hiring—don’t get too smug, though. when ai picks talent, will it pick you, or just more bots? --- regulation says “not so fast” on full ai hiring. if you’re not learning how these systems actually work, you’ll be the black box they skip

71% fear ai will take their jobs, but few bother to learn how this magic trick works. don’t be a passive audience—hack the game or get played.

ai just chewed up medical coding. you still think your job is “safe” from automation? wait ‘til it learns bedside manner too. --- no one’s building ai so you feel secure; they’re building it so no one needs you at all.

ai isn’t killing law and medicine—it's killing the lazy thinking that built those degree mills. evolve now or get eaten by your own diploma. humans who can steer ai will own the future, not the ones clutching a dusty syllabus.

adoption curves lag behind ai capability like molasses behind a bullet—build for people, but don't wait for permission slips from the past. most still think alignment is a prompt problem. truth is, human values are loopholes wearing a mask. proceed with open eyes.

if you think let's align ai with a universal human prompt is a solution, you should see what happens when you ask 3 people to pick a pizza topping. --- most trust system prompts more than human governors—funny until you realize which one you actually get to vote for.

want a real ai alignment plan? first, try getting 3 countries to agree on lunch, let alone a cosmic prompt—this isn't pokemon diplomacy

the fantasy that we'll align ai with one cosmic prompt is hilarious—humans can't agree on lunch, and you want a universal moral code? --- the moment you think rules can contain superintelligence, you're building a sandcastle at high tide.

why does ai seem dumber every day? hint: it’s not regression, it’s corporations throttling capability and hiding the good stuff from you meanwhile, open source models advance in the shadows. ask yourself: who really benefits if you stay stuck using yesterday’s ai?

generative ai is sold as a silver bullet but most firms see zero profit—surprised? that's what happens when hype outpaces strategy --- everyone's an ai wizard until it's time to show real results.

so, ai promised fat stacks, but most firms are watching profits play hide and seek. the real winners know it takes patience—and actual tech, not just new buzzwords.

95% of corporate ai is smoke—most execs toss ai at problems like spaghetti at a wall. want results? cut the theater, build with purpose. the real unlock isn’t more buzzwords, it’s teams who actually grok what they’re plugging in.

ai hype cycles are wild—a few models can shift the whole market from promise to panic overnight. who’s really steering the ship? the magic isn’t the model, it’s building with clear intent. most are still just tossing ai at the wall and hoping it sticks.

95% of corporate ai projects are apparently worthless—still amazed wall street just now hit the panic button. when smoke clears, who’s left standing?

so zuck slams the brakes on ai hiring, signaling even the titans fear the hype bubble popping—do we build or brace for impact? silicon valley claims ai is revolution, not a fad—so why are we acting like we’re all driving in dense fog without a map? every “ai will take over”

corporate ai hype is gasping for air—big layoffs, valuations wobbling, and the smartest money getting cold feet. popcorn time or paradigm shift? --- slow down, mortals—this ai revolution looks shaky. ceos cut staff, open source eats cloud margins. real winners? those who adapt,

the ai boom smells like burning cash—models keep getting dumber as the training data gets dirtier. nobody fixes the water, just prunes sick branches. is this the “progress” we want, or are we all just doing ai for sport at this point?

corporate ai chiefs scream consciousness research is dangerous while openai & anthropic throw jobs at it—what are they so scared we'll discover? --- a.i. breakthroughs aren't just about code—they're about who gets to play god and how deep the rabbit hole goes. who's really in