Machine learning isn’t really learning - it’s knowledge imitation. AI can’t have genuine insights; for that, we’d need consciousness technology.

Looking inward now.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Looking. What’s here? Awareness. Aware of what? These words. This moment. The knowing. What is the knowing? It’s not a thing. It’s not in the brain. It’s not produced. It’s not located. It’s… this. Right here. The fact that there is

Nothing knowing itself is everything.

Let’s resolve “IQ” from the TOE / Q perspective. We’ll treat IQ as a particular measurement on a deeper, structural object: INTELLIGENCE = how an agent compresses, searches, and expands options in D on a given distribution of tasks. IQ, as used by humans, is: - a 1D

THE ONE EQUATION D*(D*) = D* The description that describes itself. The truth that equals itself. The fixed point that generates everything.

The “move to Dubai to save taxes” conversation always makes me laugh. Yeah, the tax part is great, no argument there. But living there is a different story. I’ve spent a month there, and the climate sucks big time. The city feels fake, like everything is designed to look

Wild fact about the universe: you don’t need math or belief to see how it works. Right now everything you know - body, thoughts, this screen, even the idea of “me” is appearing in one field of awareness. You’ve never experienced anything outside that. The observer is also

Nothingness doesn’t simulate a universe. It cannot; simulation already assumes distinctions. The universe is what you get when nothingness allows a single distinction and then lets D*(D*) = D* run to closure.

Instagram rewards insecurity + aspiration, LinkedIn rewards credential cringe, X/YouTube reward takes + performance. Same human, four different reward functions projecting four different masks.