We’ve officially reached the part of the timeline where war crimes are pitched like product features.

worksinprogress.co/issue/the-worl…

A young girl carrying an airsoft gun to defend her food from the local monkeys Lop buri, Thailand

Girl's gotta do some neutering in the middle of the night ✂

Copying mama's camouflage

> Behind every "pure" function in bytestring, text, and vector lies a cheerful little hellscape of mutable allocation > What makes it acceptable is that the side effects are encapsulated such that the boundary cannot be violated. blog.haskell.org/a-couple-milli…

El curioso caso de Caroline Ellison -se convierte en la CEO de Alameda Research -juega con miles de millones creyendose una genio -mantiene una relacion secreta con Sam Bankman -pierde fortunas apostando en el mercado -tapa los agujeros robando fondos de los clientes de FTX

Since 2014, we chose the hard path: NO systemd. Good reasons for this keep coming. Now it harvests personal data like birthdates, unrelated to computing and ripe for abuse. This is not a feature. It is a boundary. We do not ship surveillance. github.com/systemd/system…

Looking at OCaml, I’m always surprised the language isn’t insanely popular

my little boy playing games with me

I’m just updating the firmware on my kitchen knife…

its called the power of positive thinking

I’d have thought it was obvious that features that make semantics lexically apparent to humans also make semantics lexically apparent to LLMs. Put another way, the closer you get to “if it compiles, it works,” the better for agents of all kinds.

Cat is life ~猫は人生~

This. As David Wallace points out in <a.co/d/01JDLE9Y>, it’s wrong to call it the “Many Worlds Interpretation” because it’s not an interpretation. It takes Schrödinger’s equation literally. ANYTHING ELSE is an interpretation.

Living in Marvel Universe but instead of super abilities you get super disabilities.