Which Salafi Sect is the saved one though? 🤔

The very next line from Tabari in his own screen-shot reads: "and their taking of LORDS besides Him". If you're going to cherry pick a quote to support the false belief that Pagans had tawhid, try choosing one where the author doesn't refute that assumption in the next line 👍

1. Tawheed Rububiyyah entails affirming All the attributes of Lordship to Allah Alone not just creating etc. A person can believe that Allah is the sole creator but at the same time attribute ability to harm & benefit, protection etc to other than Allah.

It took you almost an entire year before you could even offer a response to how it’s possible to affirm tawheed Rububiyyah after you affirmed that shirk uluhiyyah negates tawheed in it’s entirety. Anyway that’s besides the point as the issue today is focusing on tawheed R.

PLEASE STUDY THE LOGIC OF GEELLE'S ARGUMENTS against Salafiyyah (rep'd by Kalāmunveiled) on the Uluhiyyah/Rububiyyah distinction, and how he exposes at least 2 major flaws in their reasoning. I'll try to sum up the arguments here & @Geelle22533112 can correct me if I'm off 🧵

The truth is this kalamunveiled himself don't understand the Wahhabi trinity, That's why he is saving himself by replying a side, while bro @Geelle22533112 addressed his points with his own ss. Never seen a harder cult like wahhabism.

Like I always say, salafi literalism is a stepping stone to apostasy.

No wonder you left. Salafism is a methodological and epistemological mess. Someone well versed with traditional Islam and the basics of Ashari/Maturidi theology (which is the majority) will never become a murtad due to doubts etc.

@iFlashFX Observer What does that mean? You affirm that tabari states they took them as lords beside Allah but despite this you can’t even bring yourself to acknowledge that this means they committed shirk Rububiyyah. Does taking lords beside Allah mean something else to you ?

Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (ra) LEGITIMISES & ENCOURAGES people with numb legs (pins & needles?) to say "YA MUHAMMAD" for a cure. This is in his "Al-Kalim al-Tayyib" (The Good Word), p. 96. Perhaps Ibn Taymiyyah was not so averse to seeking a means through the beloved Prophet ﷺ ♥️.

This narration causes considerable concern for Salafis, and their modern websites scramble to deny it. The fact of the matter is: it was good enough for your "ultimate Sheikh ul-Islam", Ibn Taymiyyah, to include it in his works on good things to say in specific circumstances. 👌🏽

Ebnmukhtar  Othman Marwandi

The Hadith is related by Imam al-Bukhari in his “Adab al-Mufrad” no. 964. The footnote of it being weak is added by a 20th C. Sayyid al- Jamilī who is using AlBani’s grading; NOT the words of Ibn Taymiyyah. It is undoubtable that he took is as usable as did Imam Nawawi & Shawkani

'Abd-Allāh bin Mas'ūd (May Allāh be pleased with him) stated: You are in an age where the fuqahā are many, but the exacting recitors are few. The limits set by the Qur'ān are kept by many even though they can't pronounce it's letters properly. ⬇️

Fresh one bitter reality of South Asian wahhabis ⬇️